10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-4637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring Wing Structures for Reduced Drag Penalty in Off-Design Flight Conditions

Abstract: The induced drag penalty associated with off-design flight conditions is investigated. The investigation is limited to off-design flight conditions at a lower lift coefficient than the design lift coefficient. Two types of total angle of incidence distribution obtained at the design condition are studied. One is the distribution for elliptic spanloads and the other is the spanload distribution for straight-line wrapped surfaces. It is shown that the penalty may be significant as the structural deformation chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development and use of automated wing design in a multidisciplinary environment were discussed by Neill et al [14], who implemented a directional algorithm using sensitivity analysis and constraint approximations. Papila et al [46] performed an optimization by investigating the induced drag penalty associated with flight under lower lift coefficient conditions. Their wing structural model consisted of a main box section and 15 equally spaced ribs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development and use of automated wing design in a multidisciplinary environment were discussed by Neill et al [14], who implemented a directional algorithm using sensitivity analysis and constraint approximations. Papila et al [46] performed an optimization by investigating the induced drag penalty associated with flight under lower lift coefficient conditions. Their wing structural model consisted of a main box section and 15 equally spaced ribs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development and use of the Automated Structural Optimization System (ASTROS) with wing structural design in multidisciplinary environment were discussed by Neill et al [8], who implemented the feasible directions algorithm with sensitivity analysis and constraint approximations. Papila et al [9] considered different optimization strategies by investigating the induced drag penalty associated with flight conditions having lower lift coefficient than the one associated with the design flight conditions. Their wing structural model consisted of main box section and fifteen equally spaced ribs.…”
Section: /16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the shape of the lift distribution for a twisted wing changes with lift coefficient [8][9][10], and induced drag can increase significantly at off-design lift coefficients [11]. Although it is generally desirable to achieve minimum induced drag at or near a representative cruise lift coefficient, the structural limits of the wing must be designed to a high lift coefficient corresponding to a maneuver or gust load.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%