2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Takeover protection and managerial myopia: Evidence from real earnings management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

26
103
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(136 reference statements)
26
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the following studies could suffer from the same problem. For instance, in Zhao et al (2012) and Chi et al (2011), the suspect firms have significantly lower median performance than the non-suspect firms. Other things being equal, firms with smaller profits exhibit a higher level of REM activities on average (See Figure 2).…”
Section: Subsequent Research On Real Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the following studies could suffer from the same problem. For instance, in Zhao et al (2012) and Chi et al (2011), the suspect firms have significantly lower median performance than the non-suspect firms. Other things being equal, firms with smaller profits exhibit a higher level of REM activities on average (See Figure 2).…”
Section: Subsequent Research On Real Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…McGuire et al (2012) study the impact of religion on financial reporting and find a positive association between religiosity and real earnings management. Zhao et al (2012) study the effect of takeover protection on real earnings management and find that less-protected firms are associated with higher levels of real earnings management. Chi et al (2011) examine the impact of audit quality on the choice of earnings management tools.…”
Section: Subsequent Research On Real Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this study considers other control variables shown in the prior literature to be associated with accrual management (e.g. Klein, 2002;Roychowdhury, 2006;Cohen and Zarowin, 2010;Gunny, 2010;Badertscher, 2011;Kim et al, 2012;Zang, 2012;Zhao et al, 2012;Alissa et al, 2013;Duellman et al, 2013;). Specifically, the authors include absolute change in net income (ABS∆NI), size (SIZE), long-term indebtedness (LEVLONG), sum of inventory and receivables (INVREC), assets growth (GROWTH), financial performance (ROA), and an indicator variable for firms reporting losses (LOSS).…”
Section: Control Variables and Base Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey further states that managers often choose to sacrifice the long term economic value of their firms to avoid more severe firm value damaged by market reactions to missing the earnings expectations of analysts and investors. Some studies also document that when managers face increased capital market pressure, they may sacrifice the long term value of a firm to achieve short term earnings benchmarks (Bhojrai and Libby 2005; Zhao et al 2012).…”
Section: Market Reactions To Ceo Successionsmentioning
confidence: 99%