2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking account of genomics in quantitative microbial risk assessment: what methods? what issues?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Njage et al [23] showed that none of the four stress response categories could be represented by a unique population, instead, maximum growth rates of L. monocytogenes were multimodal distributions, which implied the presence of different subgroups of strains: (1) The relative growth rate distribution for the cold stress response class was estimated as consisting of 3% of cold susceptible strains (µ max = 0.76) and 97% of cold tolerant strains (µ max = 1.01); (2) The relative growth rate distribution for the acid stress response class was estimated as consisting of 4% of highly susceptible strains (µ max = 0.41), 44% of susceptible strains (µ max = 0.85), 50% of tolerant strains (µ max = 1.13) and 3% of highly tolerant strains (µ max = 1.50); (3) The relative growth rate distribution for the salt stress response class was estimated as consisting of 16% of susceptible strains (µ max = 0.83), 77% of tolerant strains (µ max = 1.01) and 7% of highly tolerant strains (µ max = 1.18); and (4) The relative growth rate distribution for the desiccation stress response class was estimated as consisting of 21% of susceptible strains (µ max = 0.87), 74% of tolerant strains (µ max = 1.02) and 4% of highly tolerant strains (µ max = 1.26). This approach, however, demands the collection of a database of strains with available WGS and phenotypic data on microbial adaptation to various inherent food characteristics and conditions encountered during food processing and handling [30].…”
Section: Monocytogenes Growth Kinetic Parameters As Drivers Of the Fi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Njage et al [23] showed that none of the four stress response categories could be represented by a unique population, instead, maximum growth rates of L. monocytogenes were multimodal distributions, which implied the presence of different subgroups of strains: (1) The relative growth rate distribution for the cold stress response class was estimated as consisting of 3% of cold susceptible strains (µ max = 0.76) and 97% of cold tolerant strains (µ max = 1.01); (2) The relative growth rate distribution for the acid stress response class was estimated as consisting of 4% of highly susceptible strains (µ max = 0.41), 44% of susceptible strains (µ max = 0.85), 50% of tolerant strains (µ max = 1.13) and 3% of highly tolerant strains (µ max = 1.50); (3) The relative growth rate distribution for the salt stress response class was estimated as consisting of 16% of susceptible strains (µ max = 0.83), 77% of tolerant strains (µ max = 1.01) and 7% of highly tolerant strains (µ max = 1.18); and (4) The relative growth rate distribution for the desiccation stress response class was estimated as consisting of 21% of susceptible strains (µ max = 0.87), 74% of tolerant strains (µ max = 1.02) and 4% of highly tolerant strains (µ max = 1.26). This approach, however, demands the collection of a database of strains with available WGS and phenotypic data on microbial adaptation to various inherent food characteristics and conditions encountered during food processing and handling [30].…”
Section: Monocytogenes Growth Kinetic Parameters As Drivers Of the Fi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, several hundred or even thousands of genomic features are evaluated. If tested individually, an important aspect of GWAS is, therefore, correction for multiple testing to account for spurious correlations (Guillier et al 2022 ). Microbial GWAS, and particularly bacterial GWAS, must handle challenges that are not relevant for human studies and vice versa .…”
Section: Data-driven Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%