2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11253-009-0253-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tame comodule type, roiter bocses, and a geometry context for coalgebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the tame-wild dichotomy is still an open problem. These definitions are slightly changed in order to treat the category of finitely cogenerated comodules, see [34] and [35]. This is quite natural since indecomposable injective comodules are commonly infinite dimensional and then they are not considered following the classical notions.…”
Section: Applications To Representation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the tame-wild dichotomy is still an open problem. These definitions are slightly changed in order to treat the category of finitely cogenerated comodules, see [34] and [35]. This is quite natural since indecomposable injective comodules are commonly infinite dimensional and then they are not considered following the classical notions.…”
Section: Applications To Representation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the coalgebra C is Morita-Takeuchi equivalent to an admissible subcoalgebra of the path coalgebra of its Gabriel quiver, see [42]. Hence we shall assume that C ⊆ kQ for certain quiver Q and kQ 1 ⊆ C. We recall from [34] and [35] that, for any finitely copresented C-comodule N with a minimal injective copresentation…”
Section: Applications To Representation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We recall from [38,44,45] that there are two different notions of tameness of K I. We define C to be of tame (resp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%