The role of bureaucratic ‘pockets of effectiveness’ (PoEs) in delivering development is generating renewed interest within development studies and development policy. In summarizing the state-of-the art in the field, this chapter shows that existing research on PoEs recognizes that politics plays a leading role in shaping the emergence and sustainability of high-performing state agencies, alongside the importance of organizational-level factors. However, the field lacks a clear sense of the particular forms of politics that shape PoE performance, partly because of a tendency to see PoEs as ‘islands’ that are divorced from their political contexts, which are in turn often theorized as being uniformly ‘neopatrimonial’ in nature. This chapter proposes an alternative approach to conceptualizing PoEs not as aberrations from the norm but as being firmly embedded within their historically-shaped political and transnational contexts, and the incentives and ideas that shape elite political behaviour therein. From this perspective, PoEs reflect the logics of patronage as well as merit-based civil-service systems, the elitism introduced into African bureaucracies by colonial rule, and the policy and lending priorities of international development agencies. PoEs thus emerge as interesting objects of enquiry in their own right but also as fascinating windows onto how the competing logics of regime survival, state-building, and democratization are playing out in Africa, within a shifting transnational context, and the implications that this has for both political and economic development.