2016
DOI: 10.1177/0022034516628868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tapered Implants in Dentistry

Abstract: The most common approach to lessen treatment times is by decreasing the healing period during which osseointegration is established. Implant design parameters such as implant surface, primary stability, thread configuration, body shape, and the type of bone have to be considered to obtain this objective. The relationship that exists between these components will define the initial stability of the implant. It is believed implant sites using a tapered design and surface modification can increase the primary sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to results to the present study, the tapered implant body (Model B) decreased stresses in both cortical and trabecular bone compared to the cylindric design (Model A). These results are in agreement with previously published data [18,19,[26][27][28][29], indicating that tapered implants could reduce peak stress in both cortical and trabecular bone. Stress analysis was performed for various implant designs by Li Huang et al [29] using three-dimensional finite element analysis approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to results to the present study, the tapered implant body (Model B) decreased stresses in both cortical and trabecular bone compared to the cylindric design (Model A). These results are in agreement with previously published data [18,19,[26][27][28][29], indicating that tapered implants could reduce peak stress in both cortical and trabecular bone. Stress analysis was performed for various implant designs by Li Huang et al [29] using three-dimensional finite element analysis approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Some of them are inherent to each particular situation, like the bone quality [17], the implant length [18], diameter [19], or the experience of the operator [20]. However, there are others, like the shape of the implant [21], the presence of threads [22] or geometry [23], and the implant bed preparation technique [24] that are not case-dependent, and the decisions on them may influence the IPS. Other aspects like implant surface roughness seems to have no effect on IPS [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implant industry has shown an increased interest in the development of new implant designs, mostly addressed to increase the IPS for the so-called immediate loading treatments [30,31]. Mainly tapered implants or its modifications have been shown to provide higher IPS when compared to cylindrical or non-tapered designs [21,32,33]. When considering immediate loading in which IPS is a determinant factor, there seems to be a general agreement that tapered or conical implants will provide better results [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, bone quality, quantity, implant geometry, and surgical technique have been considered factors that can influence the presence of micromotion or the presence of implant stability [63]. When the bone mineral density is low, the primary implant stability cannot be achieved unless certain modifications are completed during the implant bed preparation, for example—the use of specific implant designs (tapered, self-tapping) [64], under-drilling, bone condensation, or osseo-densification techniques [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%