“…For South America, several papers related to micromammal assemblage evaluations have dealt with the categorization of predators according to the modifications that they produce on prey bones, using their own methodologies for each case (Pardiñas, 1996(Pardiñas, -1998(Pardiñas, , 1999aSaavedra and Simonetti, 1998;Mondini, 2000Mondini, , 2001Mondini, , 2012Mondini, , 2017Cruz, 2008;Mondini and Muñoz, 2008). However, in the last 20 years, the number of actualistic papers has increased, especially those concerning central Argentina (see , in which the methodology proposed by Andrews (1990) and Fernández-Jalvo and Andrews (1992) Lontra longicaudis (Olfers, 1818)], enabled the allocation of these predators within the different modification categories that had been previously proposed (Gómez, 2005(Gómez, , 2007Gómez and Kaufmann, 2007;Montalvo et al, 2007Montalvo et al, , 2008bMontalvo et al, , 2012aMontalvo et al, , 2014Montalvo et al, , 2015Montalvo et al, , 2016bMontalvo and Tallade, 2009;Fernández et al, 2009a;Carrera and Fernández, 2010;Fernández, 2012;Rudzik et al, 2015;Quintana, 2015;López et al, 2017aLópez et al, ,b, 2018.…”