2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3123406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tapping mode microwave impedance microscopy

Abstract: We report tapping mode microwave impedance imaging based on atomic force microscope platforms. The shielded cantilever probe is critical to localize the tip-sample interaction near the tip apex. The modulated tip-sample impedance can be accurately simulated by the finite-element analysis and the result agrees quantitatively to the experimental data on a series of thin-film dielectric samples. The tapping mode microwave imaging is also superior to the contact mode in that the thermal drift in a long time scale … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scanning microwave microscopes ͑SMMs͒ 1,2 that combine microwave signal compatibility with the scanning probe microscope have demonstrated the capability to make quantitative material measurements with a resolution of the order of the effective probe size. As a result, reported values for SMM resolution are typically submicrometer [3][4][5] and often less than 100 nm, [6][7][8] though it is noted that such reported values depend on how SMM resolution is defined. 9 SMM-based methods have been developed for spatially resolved, quantitative measurement of a variety of material properties, including complex dielectric constant, [3][4][5]7,10,11 sheet resistance, 6,8 and tip-sample capacitance 12 ͑for comprehensive reviews, see Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Scanning microwave microscopes ͑SMMs͒ 1,2 that combine microwave signal compatibility with the scanning probe microscope have demonstrated the capability to make quantitative material measurements with a resolution of the order of the effective probe size. As a result, reported values for SMM resolution are typically submicrometer [3][4][5] and often less than 100 nm, [6][7][8] though it is noted that such reported values depend on how SMM resolution is defined. 9 SMM-based methods have been developed for spatially resolved, quantitative measurement of a variety of material properties, including complex dielectric constant, [3][4][5]7,10,11 sheet resistance, 6,8 and tip-sample capacitance 12 ͑for comprehensive reviews, see Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…‫ܥߜ‬ ௧ ሺ‫ݔ‬ Ԧሻ = ‫ܥ‬ሺℎሺ‫ݔ‬ Ԧሻ + ‫ݖ‬ ; ߝ ሺ‫ݔ‬ Ԧሻሻ − ‫ܥ‬ሺℎሺ‫ݔ‬ Ԧሻ + ‫ݖ‬ ; 1ሻ, [5] where ߝ ሺ‫ݔ‬ሻ is the local electric permittivity and h(x) the local thickness of the sample. Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In spite of the large number of successful applications of the SMM, a main challenge still remains, namely, the difficulty in mapping the electric permittivity of heterogeneous samples exhibiting large height variations. Until now, most applications have dealt with either heterogeneous 2D planar samples 6,12,22,23 or with homogeneous 3D samples, 24 but they have not addressed the general situation of 3D heterogeneous systems, yet. The emergence of the new 3D electron device technologies (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SMM has also been shown to be sensitive to magnetic domain structure [14] and photovoltaic response [15,16]. Near eld microscopy at microwave frequencies has also been applied via tapping mode technique [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%