Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492) 2003
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2003.178631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target confirmation architecture for a buried object scanning sonar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under recent concept of operations, automatics underwater vehicles (AUVs) based systems hosting low-frequency sonars are first used to search-classify-map relatively large areas at a high search rate. Abundant sonar systems were developed in the last two decades, such as side-scan sonar [2], volumetric sonar [3], and EO [4]. SCM is fast but does not exactly determine the mines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under recent concept of operations, automatics underwater vehicles (AUVs) based systems hosting low-frequency sonars are first used to search-classify-map relatively large areas at a high search rate. Abundant sonar systems were developed in the last two decades, such as side-scan sonar [2], volumetric sonar [3], and EO [4]. SCM is fast but does not exactly determine the mines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For buried targets, we employ low-frequency simulations and a detection/classification method based on [13]. First, thresholding is used to discard all pixels below a chosen brightness, to remove low-intensity background clutter.…”
Section: B Low-frequency Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both frequency categories, a joint Gaussian-Bayesian target classifier [12,13] is implemented that measures feature distributions, transforms the original feature distributions into Gaussian distributions, computes feature covariance to exploit feature correlation, and classifies the detected object using a log-likelihood ratio (LLR) test. The LLR is computed:…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%