Target‐Specific Sandwich Technique: Facial rejuvenation leveraging CPM technology

Lim, Tingsong; Frank, Konstantin; Hadjab, Basste

doi:10.1111/jocd.14342

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The consensus statements ( Table 1 ) 12–19 and the panel’s recommendations relating to HA filler treatment (described in the sections below) are summarized into a concise reference guide ( Figure 6 ). The guide is not intended to provide detailed instructions on how to prevent DIRs or attain natural-looking results, which are already available in published literature, 5 , 6 , 8–11 , 20 , 21 but rather to highlight practical considerations to support practitioners in customizing their treatment plans based on the unique conditions and needs of the individual patient.…”

Section: Consensus and Practical Approaches To Achieving Safe And Nat...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Practices in Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Treatment in Asia Pacific and Practical Approaches to Achieving Safe and Natural-Looking Results

Corduff¹,

Juniarti²,

Lim³

et al. 2022

CCID

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complications such as delayed inflammatory reactions (DIRs) and unnatural outcomes can sometimes arise from hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal filler treatments and can be challenging to address. Given the popularity of HA dermal fillers for aesthetic procedures, there is a need for preventive strategies to minimize these complications. Two hundred practitioners from 10 regions in Asia Pacific who administer HA fillers completed a survey on prevention of DIRs and unnatural outcomes. Thirteen global experts convened to evaluate the current practices and propose practical approaches for safe and appropriate use of HA dermal fillers. From the survey, the top three measures used to reduce the risk of DIRs included choosing an appropriate HA filler, aseptic technique, and patient selection. Key strategies employed to achieve natural-looking outcomes were treatment customization, understanding the rheological properties and behavior of different HA fillers, and being conservative in treatment approach. The panel developed a concise reference guide aimed at minimizing the risk of DIRs while achieving natural aesthetic outcomes. Five practical considerations were recommended: patient assessment and individualization of treatment plan, choice of an appropriate HA filler, adequate knowledge of facial anatomy, strict adherence to aseptic methods, and proper injection technique. The panel highlighted the need for education efforts to increase awareness of differential immunogenicity between HA fillers and to improve understanding on the importance of preserving aesthetic individuality for optimal results. These practical insights from the global experts support practitioners in optimizing safety and quality of aesthetic treatment with HA fillers.

show abstract

Section: Consensus and Practical Approaches To Achieving Safe And Nat...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Practices in Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Treatment in Asia Pacific and Practical Approaches to Achieving Safe and Natural-Looking Results

Corduff¹,

Juniarti²,

Lim³

et al. 2022

CCID

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Facial Overfilled Syndrome

Lim¹

2024

Dermatologic Clinics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Safety and effectiveness of combining different hyaluronic acid fillers for treatment of facial soft tissue defects: randomized trial, multilayer (“sandwich”) approach

SO¹,

MJ²,

AB³

2022

JDC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hyaluronic acid (HA) has been used as a gold standard for aesthetic facial treatments. Many different HA gels are available, and they differ in their HA concentration and rheological aspects. Treating patients with more than one HA gel in the same session or throughout the patient's life is a common practice. We want to show that a combination of different HA is safe and can have a better outcome regarding results, duration, and patient satisfaction. We have treated 30 patients, split into four groups. Patients were treated with three different HA products selected by their G’ to target different facial layers. All products were from the same brand and were injected through a cannula with one point of entry. Patients were evaluated with the WSRS and GAIS scales, showing no difference between groups. A statistically significant difference was seen when compared with basal photos. The follow-up was 12 months. No relevant side effects were detected in all groups. Considering that aging is a transversal process that implicates every facial layer, we conclude that combining different G' HA (multifiller approach) targeting precisecly different layers appears to be well tolerated and increases the average duration of aesthetic effects. More studies should be performed to confirm these preliminary results.

show abstract

Target‐Specific Sandwich Technique: Facial rejuvenation leveraging CPM technology

Cited by 3 publications

References 33 publications

Current Practices in Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Treatment in Asia Pacific and Practical Approaches to Achieving Safe and Natural-Looking Results

Current Practices in Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Treatment in Asia Pacific and Practical Approaches to Achieving Safe and Natural-Looking Results

Facial Overfilled Syndrome

Safety and effectiveness of combining different hyaluronic acid fillers for treatment of facial soft tissue defects: randomized trial, multilayer (“sandwich”) approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About