2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted beta-globin gene conversion in human hematopoietic CD34+ and Lin−CD38− cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a phenomenon had been noticed previously but the data were not completely revealing and no clear explanation was offered to explain this observation. 49 However, if one considers the experimental protocols used to introduce the Non-specific oligo-Kan/LD50C Specific oligo for eGFP mutation-EGFP3S/47NT…”
Section: The Dna Replication Process Regulates Gene Repair Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a phenomenon had been noticed previously but the data were not completely revealing and no clear explanation was offered to explain this observation. 49 However, if one considers the experimental protocols used to introduce the Non-specific oligo-Kan/LD50C Specific oligo for eGFP mutation-EGFP3S/47NT…”
Section: The Dna Replication Process Regulates Gene Repair Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Davis and co-workers introduced several types of synthetic molecules, including the chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotide into CD34-positive cells using microinjection and succeeded in demonstrating that the targeted gene was altered precisely. 49 More importantly, the inheritance of the alteration persists as the cells were expanded in culture; a requirement of this approach is to be brought forward into clinic.…”
Section: The Dna Replication Process Regulates Gene Repair Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microinjection or nuclear injection of corrective molecules has also been used to overcome the natural cell barriers (cytoplasmic and/or nuclear membranes) with additional control over the amount of nucleic acid molecules incorporated into individual cells, although presently its widespread and clinical application is impractical due to the low number of cells that can be modified using this technically-demanding methodology. Nevertheless, this strategy has also served to incorporate chimeraplasts [Zhang et al, 1998], [Liu et al, 2002a], [Tran et al, 2003], [Tagalakis et al, 2005], small DNA fragments [Kunzelmann et al, 1996], , phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides [Shoeman et al, 1997], [Lorenz et al, 1998], and triplex-forming oligonucleotides into the nucleus of target cells. Finally, ultrasound through cavitating gas bodies such as microbubbles may also prove a very useful alternative for in vivo enhanced delivery of genetic material [Pitt et al, 2004].…”
Section: Cellular and Nuclear Membranes As Physiological Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to do so have been made using 'chimeraplasty', that takes advantage of cellular mismatch repair coupled to homologous recombination using chimeric RNA-DNA strands. [4][5][6][7] However, the resultant frequency of mutation correction has been highly variable; 8,9 more consistent results were obtained when deoxyoligonucleotides instead of chimeric strands were used to induce sitespecific base changes. 10 We have been exploring an alternative approach to correct a mutant base pair directly on the chromosome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%