2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted genomic microarray analysis for identification of chromosome abnormalities in 1500 consecutive clinical cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
176
2
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
176
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Deletions involving 1q21.1 have been identified in several probands with congenital heart defects, 46 but may also be a normal copy number variant. 23,47 For this reason, the identification of the genomic rearrangement in this patient was not included in the overall positive yield.…”
Section: Results Of Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deletions involving 1q21.1 have been identified in several probands with congenital heart defects, 46 but may also be a normal copy number variant. 23,47 For this reason, the identification of the genomic rearrangement in this patient was not included in the overall positive yield.…”
Section: Results Of Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further genetic testing is performed based on specific clinical indications, at the discretion of the clinical geneticist evaluating the child (Table 1) and would often include targeted aCGH (SignatureChip ). 23 The SignatureChip detects unbalanced submicroscopic genomic alterations at more than 150 loci, including subtelomeres and known deletions or duplications associated with a clinical phenotype. GAA profiles in plasma and urine, the latter in males only, are obtained to exclude disorders of creatine synthesis.…”
Section: Genetic Testing In Autismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] Other citations involving 1q21.1 duplication cases were also assessed. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Cases of 1q21.1 duplication in GeneReviews (http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/books/NBK52787) and the four references provided therein 1,2,10,25 were reviewed as well, but no new subjects or phenotypic data were identified.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,35 We systematically reviewed 28 primary reports identified and their accompanying supplemental materials to identify unique individuals and abstract as much information as possible on each subject. 1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Any subjects with 1q21.1 duplications that were not 1.0-5.0 Mb (Figure 1) in size were excluded, 12,31 allowing us to include atypical variants that were larger or smaller than the standard duplication classes used in our analyses. We documented the ascertainment criteria, country of origin, authors, and the demographic, clinical, and genotypic characteristics of subjects in different studies, and used these variables to attempt to identify duplicate cases reported in two or more papers.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation