“…Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach to replace traditional postoperative treatments for breast cancer (BRCA). The era of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) officially commenced with the approval of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), Ipilimumab, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011. − However, ICB therapy has not achieved the expected results in clinical treatment of BRCA, mainly due to the adverse tumor-specific microenvironment. − On the one hand, BRCA, as a poorly immunogenic cold tumor, makes it difficult for ICIs to effectively block immune escape, failing to the ICB therapy. − On the other hand, the unique physiological characteristic of the breast creates an abnormal tumor mechanical microenvironment, where the fibrotic extracellular matrix (ECM) forms a natural physical barrier for drug penetration and immune cell infiltration. − Under the tumor microenvironment (TME), abnormally activated fibroblasts, known as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), are the major contributors to the immunosuppressive formation and also predominant drivers of ECM stiffening. − It has been demonstrated that targeting CAFs is conductive to enhance the efficacy of ICIs. , But considering the specific role of CAFs, direct targeting and killing of CAFs seem to be unadvisible, as it would cause the complete breakdown of the tumor matrix to facilitate tumor cell metastasis. − By contrast, an alternative strategy of inhibiting the activation of CAFs through antifibrotic drugs, reprogramming them into a quiescent state, is preferable to combat tumors rather than directly kill CAFs. , Even though, the pre-existing dense ECM still exerts a strong barrier effect on drug and lymphocytic infiltration. Therefore, a comprehensive treatment approach involving both ECM reshaping and CAFs reprogramming is urgently needed to break the physical barrier and strengthen the immunotherapeutic efficiency of fibrotic BRCA.…”