2009
DOI: 10.1517/14728220902787628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia: current status and future directions

Abstract: Background: The limit of acceptable toxicity for standard chemotherapeutic drugs used in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) therapy has been reached. New therapeutic strategies are therefore needed. Objective: This review summarizes development in new strategies, and gives an overview of the clinical status on new drugs for non-promyelocytic AML in adults. Methods: Information was principally gathered from the databases ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed.gov. Results/conclusion: The major improvements in AML treatment d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
(110 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, a CR rate of 67% was achieved and this result is remarkable if we consider that all patients had s-AML; however, CR rate for patients with unfavourable karyotype was only 28% and most of them did ultimately relapse. These data support the need for alternative approaches in older AML patients with adverse karyotype ad presentation independently from clinical eligibility for conventional induction chemotherapy [38][39][40]. Of note, there was no difference in the clinical outcome between patients aged 61-70 years and over 70 years, suggesting that biologic parameters at diagnosis rather than age by itself should be taken into account for the initial therapeutic approach in aged AML patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Overall, a CR rate of 67% was achieved and this result is remarkable if we consider that all patients had s-AML; however, CR rate for patients with unfavourable karyotype was only 28% and most of them did ultimately relapse. These data support the need for alternative approaches in older AML patients with adverse karyotype ad presentation independently from clinical eligibility for conventional induction chemotherapy [38][39][40]. Of note, there was no difference in the clinical outcome between patients aged 61-70 years and over 70 years, suggesting that biologic parameters at diagnosis rather than age by itself should be taken into account for the initial therapeutic approach in aged AML patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The overall disease-free survival is only 40-50% even for younger patients below 60-65 years of age who can receive the most intensive chemotherapy, and new therapeutic strategies are thus warranted (Stapnes et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improved survival for AML patients during recent decades is not due to the introduction of new therapeutic agents but rather a more optimal use of well-known drugs and improved supportive care for patients receiving intensive antileukaemic therapy (Stapnes et al, 2009). The PI3K-mTOR pathway seems to be important in leukaemogenesis and may therefore be a potential therapeutic target in haematological malignancies (Park et al, 2010;Reikvam et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 In addition, both c-Kit and Flt3 inhibitors are either used clinically or are in various stages of clinical trials. 19 Therefore, these ligand/receptor systems were included as a primary focus. IL-3, G-CSF, and GM-CSF are key regulators of myeloid differentiation, acting primarily through the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) regulatory network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%