The solution structure of the complex formed between an oligodeoxynucleotide containing a twobase bulge (5′-CCATCGTCTACCTTTGGTAGGATGG) and SCA-α2, a designed spirocyclic helical molecule, has been elucidated. SCA-α2, a close mimic of the metabolite, NCSi-gb, of the DNA bulge-specific enediyne antibiotic neocarzinostatin, differs in possessing a more stable spirocyclic ring system and in lacking certain bulky groupings that compromise bulged DNA binding. This study provides a detailed comparison of the binding modes of the two complexes and provides new insights into the importance of shape and space, as opposed to simple nucleotide sequence, in complex formation at the bulge site. The two rigidly held aromatic rings of SCA-α2 form a righthanded helical molecular wedge that specifically penetrates the bulge binding pocket and immobilizes the two bulge residues (GT), which point towards the minor groove, rather than the major groove as in the NCSi-gb•bulged DNA complex. The ligand aromatic ring systems stack on the DNA bulge-flanking base pairs that define the long sides of the triangular prism binding pocket. Like NCSi-gb, SCA-α2 possesses the natural N-methyl furanose moiety, α-linked to the benzindanol (BI) moiety. The aminosugar anchors in the major groove of the DNA and points toward the 3′-bulgeflanking base pair. Lacking the bulky cyclocarbonate of NCSi-gb, the SCA-α2•bulged DNA complex has a much less twisted and buckled 3'-bulge-flanking base pair (dG20·dC8), and the G20 residue stacks directly above the BI ring platform. Also, the absence of the methyl group and the free rotation of the methoxy group on the dihydronaphthanone (NA) moiety of SCA-α2 allow better stacking geometry of the NA ring above the 5′-bulge-flanking base pair dG21·dC5. These and other considerations help to explain why NCSi-gb binds very poorly to bulged RNA and are consistent with the recent observation of good binding with SCA-α2. Thus, although the two complexes resemble each other closely, they differ in important local environmental details. SCA-α2 has a better * To whom correspondence should be addressed: Irving H. Goldberg, Telephone: (617) (Table S1), proton chemical shift changes (ppm) of the bound form of SCA-α2 in the SCA-α2•bulged 25-mer DNA complex (in D 2 O at 25 °C) relative to the free form of SCA-α2 (in d4-MeOH at 25 °C) (Table S2), the exchangeable proton chemical shifts (ppm) of DNA components within the SCA-α2•bulged 25-mer DNA complex in H 2 O buffer at pH 6.8 and 10°C (Table S3 A), the non-exchangeable proton chemical shifts (ppm) of DNA components within the SCA-α2•bulged 25-mer DNA complex in D 2 O buffer at pH 6.8 and 10°C (Table S3 B), the titration of various amount of SCA-α2 into 25-mer bulged DNA as monitored by 1 H NMR spectra shown as expanded imino proton region ( Figure S1), the expanded NOESY (200 ms mixing time) contour plots of the SCA-α2•bulged 25mer DNA complex, focusing on the amino and aromatic proton regions ( Figure S2), the expanded NOESY (200 ms mixing time) contour plots for the b...