2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting the BACE1 Active Site Flap Leads to a Potent Inhibitor That Elicits Robust Brain Aβ Reduction in Rodents

Abstract: By targeting the flap backbone of the BACE1 active site, we discovered 6-dimethylisoxazole-substituted biaryl aminothiazine 18 with 34-fold improved BACE1 inhibitory activity over the lead compound 1. The cocrystal structure of 18 bound to the active site indicated two hydrogen-bond interactions between the dimethylisoxazole and threonine 72 and glutamine 73 of the flap. Incorporation of the dimethylisoxazole substitution onto the related aminothiazine carboxamide series led to pyrazine-carboxamide 26 as a ver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The docking analysis represented that both two compounds interacted with the second water binding site of BACE1, where lupeol showed strong hydrophobic interactions with the flap region. These results demonstrated the inhibition mechanism of lupeol and ursolic acid, which are also consistent with the previously published docking results [23,[40][41][42][43][44][45]. Subsequently, the binding free energies of two complexes have been analyzed by MM-GBSA and MM/GBVI methods, and in both cases, lupeol showed better binding energies than ursolic acid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The docking analysis represented that both two compounds interacted with the second water binding site of BACE1, where lupeol showed strong hydrophobic interactions with the flap region. These results demonstrated the inhibition mechanism of lupeol and ursolic acid, which are also consistent with the previously published docking results [23,[40][41][42][43][44][45]. Subsequently, the binding free energies of two complexes have been analyzed by MM-GBSA and MM/GBVI methods, and in both cases, lupeol showed better binding energies than ursolic acid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…By fitting the pharmacophore against MBM, BACE1 was picked out as a HPT for berberine with a value of 0.788156 ( Table 1 ). The complex of BACE1 with compound 10 (5ENM) was calculated using force field CHARMm which showed the binding energy to be -110.2 kcal/mol ( Wu et al, 2016 ). The docked complex of BACE1 with berberine was more structurally stable and energetically favorable than the compound 10, with the binding energy reaching to -123.6 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent BACE1 inhibitors that were developed using CADD will be summarized in this section. In silico structure-based design was extensively employed in the development of BACE1 inhibitors including the discovery of peptides with a 5-fluoroorotyl moiety [37], 5,5 -disubstituted aminohydantoins [38], bicyclic iminopyrimidinones [39], iminopyrimidinones [40], cyclic sulfone hydroxyethylamines [41], imidazopyridines containing isoindoline-1,3-dione [42], iminochromene-2H-carboxamide derivatives containing different aminomethylene triazole [43], 2-substituted-thio-N-(4-substituted-thiazol/1H-imidazol-2-yl)acetamide derivatives [44], cyclopropane-based conformationally restricted analogues [45], 6-dimethylisoxazole-substituted biaryl aminothiazines [46], and other compounds [47]. In these studies, a combination of molecular docking, X-ray crystallography, synthesis, and in vitro testing was utilized to develop potent BACE1 inhibitors.…”
Section: Cadd For the Development Of Bace1 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%