2010
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.52814620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Contingencies in the Curvilinear Relationships Between Intergroup Networks and Initiative Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
186
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
8
186
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The economies of scale often become diseconomies after a certain point; the learning curve reaches a point of cumulative production quantity where improvements are insignificant (Stock et al, 2001). Furthermore, in recent times, several studies have proved how the effect of density and strength of the ties in networks (cluster connectedness) also describes an inverted-U shape relationship (Molina-Morales and -Fernandez, 2009or Lechner et al, 2010.…”
Section: Insert Figure 2 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economies of scale often become diseconomies after a certain point; the learning curve reaches a point of cumulative production quantity where improvements are insignificant (Stock et al, 2001). Furthermore, in recent times, several studies have proved how the effect of density and strength of the ties in networks (cluster connectedness) also describes an inverted-U shape relationship (Molina-Morales and -Fernandez, 2009or Lechner et al, 2010.…”
Section: Insert Figure 2 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploratory innovation requires new knowledge (Benner and Tushman 2002) and is facilitated when a work environment promotes risktaking and provides knowledge-rich stimuli and sufficient resources (Amabile et al 1996;Jansen et al 2012). Managers who span boundaries thus encounter a wider range of people with different outlooks and approaches (Perry-Smith and Shalley 2003) and may find it easier to navigate and nurture their entrepreneurial projects despite organizational politics (Lechner et al 2010). In fact, recent studies suggest that interactions with members of internal and external networks enable MMs to gain the support they need to protect their entrepreneurial activities and leverage their credibility (Morris et al 2010) as well as legitimacy (Hornsby et al 2013).…”
Section: Boundary-spanning and Strategic Renewalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While prior research has identified how certain network dimensions, such as tie strength and network centrality, can lead to particular benefits for large firms (Lechner et al, 2010), relevant knowledge of small firms is limited. This study highlights the importance of active engagement in networking activities for small firms (Obstfeld, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%