1982
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(82)90010-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task-hemispheric integrity in dual task performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A third goal is to evaluated predictions related to the compatibility of display of OT (vehicle control) information in either the right left visual field (hemispherically compatible; Wickens & Sandry, 1982), or in the upper visual field (ambient incompatible, Previc, 1998Previc, , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third goal is to evaluated predictions related to the compatibility of display of OT (vehicle control) information in either the right left visual field (hemispherically compatible; Wickens & Sandry, 1982), or in the upper visual field (ambient incompatible, Previc, 1998Previc, , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, hand differences in motor speed do not necessarily translate into cognitive processing differences between the hemispheres. The hand differences we found could indicate nonspecific vigilance or differential motor practice effects (Wickens and Sandry, 1982). Moreover, in the context of implicit learning, they could reflect hemispheric differences in response planning rather than in the detection and application of a sequential rule.…”
Section: Alternative Accountsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A third difficulty concerns "structural alteration effects", which can often be observed when two tasks are time shared and one of them has a change in processing structure, such as input or output modality or memory code. Under such circumstances a change in interference between the two tasks has been repeatedly observed although as such the difficulty of both tasks remained unaltered (Isreal, 1980;Martin, 1980;Rollins & Hendricks, 1980;Treisman & Davies, 1973;Vidulich & Wickens, 1981;Wickens et al, 1983;Harris, Owens & North, 1978;McLeod, 1977;Wickens, 1980;Friedman, Polson, Dafoe & Gaskill, 1982;McFarland & Ashton, 1978;Wickens & Sandry, 1982;Pritchard & Hendrickson, 1985). It is certainly impossible to account for such results by a simple single capacity notion.…”
Section: Problems With An Undifferenciated Single Resource Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brooks (1968) also showed this hemispheric specificity, even within one task; a task -' requiring spatial working memory was performed better in combination with a verbal response while a task relying on verbal working memory could better be performed with a spatial response. Furthermore, reaction time is lengthened when the hemisphere of stimulus processing is the same as that controlling the responses (Allwitt, 1981;Dimond & Beaumont, 1972;Wickens & Sandry, 1982).…”
Section: Multiple Resource Volume Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%