Image Processing, Analysis, Measurement, and Quality 1988
DOI: 10.1117/12.944702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Specific Complexity Metrics For Electronic Vision

Abstract: This paper presents a mathematical basis for establishing achievable performance levels for multisensor electronic vision systems.A random process model of the multisensor scene environment is developed. The concept of feature space and its importance in the context of this model is presented.A set of complexity metrics used to measure the difficulty of an electronic vision task in a given scene environment is developed and presented.These metrics are based on the feature space used for the electronic vision t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on TIR and TBIR, two new measures: TIR squared (T IR 2 ) and TBIR squared (T BIR 2 ) are developed respectively in [22]. Garlson et al [30] observed that there must be measureable differences between the feature distributions of the target areas and of the background areas when a feature-based target recognizer works well. The author posited that the extent to which the distributions are not different, determines the complexity of the task.…”
Section: Global Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on TIR and TBIR, two new measures: TIR squared (T IR 2 ) and TBIR squared (T BIR 2 ) are developed respectively in [22]. Garlson et al [30] observed that there must be measureable differences between the feature distributions of the target areas and of the background areas when a feature-based target recognizer works well. The author posited that the extent to which the distributions are not different, determines the complexity of the task.…”
Section: Global Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern would then represent the laser beam immediately after leaving the focusing optics and before the atmosphere has altered its wavefront. Comparison of imagery from each location with imagery from the far-field could be performed to ensure that data (7) collected from each imager using the TCC image processors is properly registered. Each imager would then have common LOSs, and the imager FOVs would subtend a common window in the target plane.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%