2010
DOI: 10.1002/job.725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective

Abstract: SummaryApplying Higgins' regulatory focus theory, we hypothesized that the effect of positive/negative feedback on motivation and performance is moderated by task type, which is argued to be an antecedent to situational regulatory focus (promotion or prevention). Thus, first we demonstrated that some tasks (e.g., tasks requiring creativity) are perceived as promotion tasks, whereas others (e.g., those requiring vigilance and attention to detail) are perceived as prevention tasks. Second, as expected, our tests… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
156
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
9
156
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both negative and positive information can either increase or decrease overall performance (for a review, see, Kluger & DeNisi, 1996). Additionally, negative information has a larger impact on performance than positive information on tasks where attention and accuracy are important (e.g., Van Dijk & Kluger, 2011). In our older adults, the positive information we provided may have required a much stronger delivery to overcome negative stereotypes about aging and memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both negative and positive information can either increase or decrease overall performance (for a review, see, Kluger & DeNisi, 1996). Additionally, negative information has a larger impact on performance than positive information on tasks where attention and accuracy are important (e.g., Van Dijk & Kluger, 2011). In our older adults, the positive information we provided may have required a much stronger delivery to overcome negative stereotypes about aging and memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Arguably, therefore, negative information impacted older but not young adults because having performed poorly compared to young adults is in keeping with negative cultural expectations about aging and memory (Meisner, 2012). Hence, older adults may have been more likely to experience stereotype threat, which may have lead them to adopt a prevention motivational focus in which they become focused on avoiding errors of commission (i.e., positively recognizing a face that they did not actually previously encounter) (e.g., Barber & Mather, 2013b;Higgins, 1998;Van Dijk & Kluger, 2011). Further research is needed to address whether negative information promotes stereotype threat in younger and older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should contribute to negative feelings such as tension and agitation, which can be expected to adversely affect job satisfaction (cf., Brockner & Higgins, 2001;Van Dijk & Kluger, 2011), and also result in emotional exhaustion (e.g. Lazarus, 1999;McGrath, 1976).…”
Section: Origin and Characteristics Of Oio Versus Siomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue concerns individual differences. Is improving feedback likely to be more effective for low than high self-esteem persons (Brown, Farnham, & Cook, 2002), low than high narcissists (Campbell, Rudich, & Sedikides, 2002), incremental self-theorists than entity self-theorists (Plaks & Stecher, 2007), individuals with mastery-approach goals than masteryavoidance goals (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), and persons with a prevention-focus than a promotion-focus orientation (Van Dijk & Kluger, 2010)? Yet another issue concerns cultural context.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%