Taxing Issues: Geography, Politics and the 2003 Tax Reform Referendum in Alabama

Abstract

In 2002, conservative Republican Bob Riley was elected governor of Alabama on a platform of cutting spending and freezing taxes. But within weeks of taking office, Riley proposed a tax reform package which promised to increase the state's tax receipts and reduce its tax code's highly regressive character. The tax reform package was submitted to the voters in September 2003, and rejected by more than a two to one margin. This article examines the electoral politics and geography of Riley's efforts to reform Alabama's tax system including the spatial pattern of voting on the reform package. It finds that Riley's political base of Christian conservatives was substantially responsible for the reform package's defeat. Conversely, those counties providing a majority of their support for the Governor's effort were nearly all substantially African American, and had voted for Riley's opponent in the 2002 gubernatorial election.

Fear of crime as a political weapon: explaining the rise of extreme right politics in the Flemish countryside

“…These findings are in line with the work of a number of political geographers in the USA who argue that the results of referendums on gay rights (Omrod and Cole 1996;Brown, Knopp and Morill 2005) and tax reforms (Webster and Webster 2004) reflect a major cleavage between 'modernizers' and 'traditionalists'. Just like they argue that the progressive modernizers are said to be mostly urban based and that the conservative traditionalists can be found in small towns and rural areas, our multi-level analysis suggests that urban dwellers are in general less racist than the inhabitants of rural and suburban municipalities.…”

Taxonomy: racism versus fiscal conservatism in voting on segregationist provisions in Alabama’s constitution

“…2003-78). 8 Although property taxes would have increased substantially, it was estimated at the time that almost 67% of all families in Alabama would either have seen their tax bills fall or remain unchanged if the amendment was adopted (Webster and Webster 2004). The electorate nevertheless soundly rejected the constitutional amendment, with only 32.5% of those voting favoring Governor Riley's plan.…”