2013
DOI: 10.1366/12-06783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic Classification of Phytoplankton with Multivariate Optical Computing, Part I: Design and Theoretical Performance of Multivariate Optical Elements

Abstract: Phytoplankton are single-celled, photosynthetic algae and cyanobacteria found in all aquatic environments. Differential pigmentation between phytoplankton taxa allows use of fluorescence excitation spectroscopy for discrimination and classification. For this work, we applied multivariate optical computing (MOC) to emulate linear discriminant vectors of phytoplankton fluorescence excitation spectra by using a simple filter-fluorometer arrangement. We grew nutrient-replete cultures of three differently pigmented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). [27][28][29] This is a method of detecting the accessory pigments in phytoplankton, and is therefore a rough optical analog of pigment analysis via HPLC except that it can be performed rapidly on single cells. Our efforts can be divided into the tasks of: (1) recording sufficient spectra of different species; (2) data exploration to identify spectroscopic features or patterns that best differentiate species from one another; (3) selecting optical filter elements for these features; and (4) associating class information with responses on the sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). [27][28][29] This is a method of detecting the accessory pigments in phytoplankton, and is therefore a rough optical analog of pigment analysis via HPLC except that it can be performed rapidly on single cells. Our efforts can be divided into the tasks of: (1) recording sufficient spectra of different species; (2) data exploration to identify spectroscopic features or patterns that best differentiate species from one another; (3) selecting optical filter elements for these features; and (4) associating class information with responses on the sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field deployable commercial spectrometers are readily available. We also envision that a non‐imaging, non‐spectral based, measurement could be developed using the spectrally separated Chl and carotenoid/autofluorescence emissions and standard filters or a specially designed multivariate optical element (Swanstrom et al, ). Further, as this is an optical approach, we hypothesize that remote sensing technologies (Reichardt et al, ) could monitor these spectral regions and this is an area of current investigation by our group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their size and power requirements, broadband lamps are seldom used for in situ measurement at present. However, some special applications such as single-cell fluorescence excitation spectroscopy systems [54] and multivariate optical computing instruments [55] require super high power Xe arc lamps (75 W).…”
Section: Various Light Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Swanstrom et al [96] developed a dynamicflow fluorescence imaging filter photometer, which uses an imaging CCD array to record fluorescence. Before this development, the theoretical characteristics of the designs were described in determining which optical elements were selected for fabrication [55]. The same researchers present a semiautomatic approach for extracting fluorescence intensities from the imaging photometer data along with a quantitative analysis of factors contributing to noise, including the detector read and dark noise.…”
Section: Array Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%