2017
DOI: 10.5507/fot.2016.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic status of Chara tenuspina A. Br. (Streptophyta: Charales) based on LM morphology, matK, atpB and rbcL of cpDNA sequences

Abstract: Chara tenuispina a. br. is an extremely rare species of the genus Chara L., which inhabits freshwater and shaded, shallow water environments on calcareous peat bogs, as compared to C. globularis ThUill., which is a widespread species. To re-examine the taxonomic system proposed by Wood & imahori (1965), who treated C. tenuispina as a variety of C. globularis, we studied the morphology of both species, as well as their phylogenetic relationships, based on three cpDNA gene sequences (atpB, matK, rbcL). In genera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results can also be helpful in explaining the phylogenetic relationships between species (Sakayama et al 2002(Sakayama et al , 2004(Sakayama et al , 2005Urbaniak 2010). The large amount of data collected during this study seems to confirm the considerable variety in oospore size among populations of the same species, as has been reported previously (caSanova 1997;bLUme et al 2009;Urbaniak 2010;Urbaniak & combik 2017).…”
Section: Taxonomic Significance Of Oospore Dimensions and Wall Ornamesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Such results can also be helpful in explaining the phylogenetic relationships between species (Sakayama et al 2002(Sakayama et al , 2004(Sakayama et al , 2005Urbaniak 2010). The large amount of data collected during this study seems to confirm the considerable variety in oospore size among populations of the same species, as has been reported previously (caSanova 1997;bLUme et al 2009;Urbaniak 2010;Urbaniak & combik 2017).…”
Section: Taxonomic Significance Of Oospore Dimensions and Wall Ornamesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Alguns pesquisadores como Braun & Nordstedt (1882), Groves & Bullock-Webster (1924), Zaneveld (1940) e Krause (1997) categorizaram cada variação morfológica como espécies distintas. Wood & Imahori (1965), na monografia mundial de Characeae, interpretaram que o gênero possuía poucas espécies com ampla gama de variações morfológicas e o subdividiram em subgêneros, seções e subseções, baseando-se em caracteres puramente morfológicos Borges & Necchi-Junior 2017;Urbaniak & Combik 2017). Esse arranjo embora ainda amplamente utilizado, tem sido questionado por trabalhos com enfoque molecular (Meiers et al 1999;Sakayama et al 2009;Schneider et al 2015;Schneider et al 2016;Nowak et al 2016;Borges & Necchi-Junior 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified