1966
DOI: 10.2307/3119730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
146
0
20

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(379 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
146
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…After configuration of the BERT model for our purposes, it was adopted to automatically classify cognitive engagement, metacognitive engagement, behavioral engagement, and emotional engagement during online collaborative learning. In particular, cognitive engagement was automatically classified into remembering, understanding, applying, and evaluat- ing as well as off-topic information adapted from Bloom et al (1956). Bloom's cognitive domains taxonomy includes remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating (Bloom et al, 1956).…”
Section: Automated Group Learning Engagement Analysis and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After configuration of the BERT model for our purposes, it was adopted to automatically classify cognitive engagement, metacognitive engagement, behavioral engagement, and emotional engagement during online collaborative learning. In particular, cognitive engagement was automatically classified into remembering, understanding, applying, and evaluat- ing as well as off-topic information adapted from Bloom et al (1956). Bloom's cognitive domains taxonomy includes remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating (Bloom et al, 1956).…”
Section: Automated Group Learning Engagement Analysis and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Análisis de la propuesta de Talaván y Lertola (2022) bajo el prisma de la taxonomía de Bloom (Blyth et al, 1966).…”
Section: Tablaunclassified
“…c) Cognición: es fundamental que la tarea suponga un reto cognitivo. Es por ello, por lo que para el diseño de tareas AICLE es crucial tener presente la taxonomía de Bloom (Blyth et al, 1966). La taxonomía de Bloom distingue entre HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) y LOTS (Low Order Thinking Skills); dentro del primer grupo encajarían habilidades cognitivas complejas como analizar, evaluar y crear, mientras que en el segundo grupo se enmarcarían habilidades cognitivas de orden inferior como recordar, comprender, y aplicar.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 is the conceptual framework that illustrates the model of this research study. (Gardner et al, 2014), including the capacity to develop metacognition abilities through provision of opportunities as reflected in Bloom´s taxonomy of educational objectives (Blyth, 1966;Crowe et al, 2008;Cullinane & Liston, 2016;Michael & Coffman, 1956). Focus entails the tackling of ideas in a manner that brings various details into clear conceptualizations (Schmidt, 2003).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%