2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2009.00888.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy of Quaternary Deep‐sea Ostracods From the Western North Atlantic Ocean

Abstract: Late Quaternary sediments from Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Hole 1055B, Carolina Slope, western North Atlantic (32°47.041¢ N, 76°17.179¢ W; 1798 m water depth) were examined for deep-sea ostracod taxonomy. A total of 13 933 specimens were picked from 207 samples and c. 120 species were identified. Among them, 87 species were included and illustrated in this paper. Twenty-eight new species are described. The new species are: Ambocythere sturgio, Argilloecia abba, Argilloecia caju, Argilloecia keigwini, Argilloe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their calcareous shells are abundantly preserved, and both taxa have a rich fossil record accessible though deep-sea coring (e.g., Thomas and Gooday 1996;Cronin and Raymo 1997;Wollenburg et al 2007;Yasuhara et al 2008bYasuhara et al , 2009a. Ostracods and foraminifera span similar size ranges, and in the deep sea, they are thought to exploit the same food source-particulate organic matter that sinks from shallower depths (Gooday 1994(Gooday , 2003bDidié and Bauch 2002;Cronin and Dwyer 2003;Schellenberg 2007;Yasuhara and Cronin 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their calcareous shells are abundantly preserved, and both taxa have a rich fossil record accessible though deep-sea coring (e.g., Thomas and Gooday 1996;Cronin and Raymo 1997;Wollenburg et al 2007;Yasuhara et al 2008bYasuhara et al , 2009a. Ostracods and foraminifera span similar size ranges, and in the deep sea, they are thought to exploit the same food source-particulate organic matter that sinks from shallower depths (Gooday 1994(Gooday , 2003bDidié and Bauch 2002;Cronin and Dwyer 2003;Schellenberg 2007;Yasuhara and Cronin 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly little attention has been given to understanding low-latitude deepsea diversity and the temporal dynamics of the LSDGs. Although pollen records suggest a persistent latitudinal diversity gradient existed in terrestrial ecosystems over the last 13,000 years (17, 18), we know of no studies of species-level temporal dynamics of LSDGs based on fossil assemblages from marine environments, despite the sensitivity of marine ecosystems to climatic change (12,13,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).The Ostracoda (Crustacea) are an important component of the deep-sea benthos (25)(26)(27), and the only commonly fossilized metazoan group in deep-sea sediments (12,13,28). Their various habitats and ecological preferences represent a wide range of deep-sea benthic niches, and their fossil record is considered representative of the benthic community (12,13,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ostracoda (Crustacea) are an important component of the deep-sea benthos (25)(26)(27), and the only commonly fossilized metazoan group in deep-sea sediments (12,13,28). Their various habitats and ecological preferences represent a wide range of deep-sea benthic niches, and their fossil record is considered representative of the benthic community (12,13,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Rosaliella is different from Cytheropteron by lacking ala and caudal process, although both genera have very similar hingement and subcentral muscle scars and some deep-sea Cytheropteron species lack ala (e.g. see Yasuhara et al, 2009, Yasuhara andOkahashi, 2015, for Cytheropteron). Some species of Eucytherura (e.g.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some species of Eucytherura (e.g. Eucytherura pacifica Ayress, Whatley, Downing and Millson, 1995) have well-developed primary reticulation and pore clusters and very weakly developed caudal process similar to Rosaliella (Ayress et al, 1995;Yasuhara et al, 2009). However, Rosaliella differs from Eucytherura by lacking ridge, spine, and tubercle, and by having arched hingement (hingement is straight or sinuous in Eucytherura) and a comparatively less calcified shell (e.g.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%