Chapter 1Researching the implementation of TBLT in the classroom Introduction 1 Why TBLT? 4The theoretical rationale for TBLT 5 The pedagogical rationale for tasks 7The options for TBLT in the pedagogical context 8 Issues to consider in the implementation of TBLT 11 The New Zealand context 13 The curriculum 14 The learning languages area in the New Zealand Curriculum 14 The assessment of learning 15 Support for language teaching with the implementation of the new curriculum 16 An initiative to equip teachers to teach languages in New Zealand schools -TPDL 18 The current research and its relationship to the TPDL programme 26 Summary of factors relevant to implementation of TBLT/tasks in the New Zealand context 27 Outline of the book 30
Researching the implementation of TBLT in the classroomPerhaps one of the most convincing reasons for using tasks in the language classroom is that they are motivating for learners (East, 2012;Erlam, 2015a). In Erlam's study (2015a), teachers talked about how learners were motivated to use language in the ways that it is used outside of the classroom. TBLT was seen as being more fun in that it led to more oral language use in the classroom and provided opportunities for learners to interact with their peers, an aspect that the learners who participated in the research project informing this book often reported as contributing significantly to their enjoyment of lessons (see Chapters 4 and 5).
The options for TBLT in the pedagogical contextThe literature claims that there are a number of ways in which TBLT and tasks may be used in the classroom.
Task-based learning and teaching approachIn the first of these, the Task-based learning and teaching approach, tasks define both the curriculum and the syllabus and determine how learners will be assessed (Long, 1985). The tasks, and the language that is activated by these tasks, are determined according to the needs of the students (Samuda & Bygate, 2008). A task-based approach to curriculum, syllabus, and assessment design is seen to accord with what is known about how learners acquire a second language. Proponents (e.g., Long, 2015) argue that the adoption of a syllabus which specifies a predetermined sequence of language structures that are to be taught is inappropriate. This is because it cannot be assumed that the same language or syllabus will be appropriate for all learners, nor that learners will be developmentally ready to incorporate this language into their L2 repertoire. Acquisition, as it is used here, refers to the ability to use language spontaneously, similar to how a native speaker might. In other words, it refers to the development of implicit, rather than explicit language knowledge.In examining how TBLT is both understood and implemented, we are able, in our conclusion, to make practical implications for teacher development courses which introduce teachers to this methodology. At the same time, we demonstrate that analysis of our data may suggest how some of the theoretical framing of tasks and TBLT could be reconsidered....