2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher–child relationships and academic achievement: A multilevel propensity score model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
77
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For ethical reasons, random assignment to bullying victimization is not possible. Propensity score analysis (e.g., matching, stratification, and weighting) is an increasingly common method for creating equivalent groups on measured confounding variables in school psychology research (e.g., McCormick, O'Connor, Capella, & McClowry, 2013;Sullivan & Field, 2013). In addition, propensity score analysis allows researchers to address selection bias and estimate causal effects with increased certainty (Schneider, Carnoy, Kilpatrick, Schmidt, & Shavelson, 2007).…”
Section: Propensity Score Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ethical reasons, random assignment to bullying victimization is not possible. Propensity score analysis (e.g., matching, stratification, and weighting) is an increasingly common method for creating equivalent groups on measured confounding variables in school psychology research (e.g., McCormick, O'Connor, Capella, & McClowry, 2013;Sullivan & Field, 2013). In addition, propensity score analysis allows researchers to address selection bias and estimate causal effects with increased certainty (Schneider, Carnoy, Kilpatrick, Schmidt, & Shavelson, 2007).…”
Section: Propensity Score Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although empirical studies illuminate the importance of both teacher-student relationships and peer connections on students' academic and behavioral outcomes (e.g., Baker, Grant & Morlock, 2008;Buhs et al, 2006;McCormick, O'Connor, Cappella & McClowry, 2013), most studies focus on only one type of relationship. Yet, initial evidence from samples of young children and adolescents (not elementary age students) suggests both teacher-student and peer relationships uniquely contribute to students' behavioral engagement (Ladd et al, 1999;Wentzel et al, 2010).…”
Section: Supportive Social Processes: Role Of Individual Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La atención especial por parte de los docentes a los alumnos con bajo rendimiento es un elemento fundamental para reducir las desigualdades de logro educativo al mismo tiempo que favorece que todos los alumnos consigan las metas de aprendizaje establecidas en el currículo o aquéllas a las que el docente ha puesto especial interés (Brookhart, 2011;Huang& Moon, 2009;Kingston & Nash, 2011;McCormick, O'Connor, Cappella, & McClowry, 2013;Ottmar, Decker, Cameron, Curby, & Rimm-Kaufman, 2014;WyattSmith & Cumming, 2009). Por tanto, un papel fundamental en el desempeño de los docentes consiste en la realización de actividades específicas para aquellos alumnos que están en riesgo (Boonen, Van Damme, & Onghena, 2014;Campbell, Kyriakides, Muijs, & Robinson, 2004;Muñoz, Scoskie, & French, 2013;Robinson & Campbell, 2010).…”
Section: Estrategias Para El Aprendizajeunclassified