2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315669496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Quality and Teacher Education Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model of this study involves obtaining a series of self-assessments, expert assessments and standardized assessments, but does not imply their combination, hinders the study of the dependence of the level of professional competence and the quality of specialist training [8]. Over the past decade, researchers have been actively proposing mathematical models for assessing the professional skills of workers in conjunction with employer ratings [9]. When studying the relationship between assessments of the quality of specialist training and professional competence in the political sphere [10], scientists come to the conclusion: "By creating standardized work instructions, it becomes easy to assess the process and make sure that work tasks are performed at the right level of quality" [11].…”
Section: Computer Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of this study involves obtaining a series of self-assessments, expert assessments and standardized assessments, but does not imply their combination, hinders the study of the dependence of the level of professional competence and the quality of specialist training [8]. Over the past decade, researchers have been actively proposing mathematical models for assessing the professional skills of workers in conjunction with employer ratings [9]. When studying the relationship between assessments of the quality of specialist training and professional competence in the political sphere [10], scientists come to the conclusion: "By creating standardized work instructions, it becomes easy to assess the process and make sure that work tasks are performed at the right level of quality" [11].…”
Section: Computer Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide more of a national and global context, we should point out that even though the U.S. Department of Education and Council for Higher Education recognizes CAEP “as the sole accrediting body for educator preparation” (Shrum & Glisan, 2016, p. 5), national accreditation in the United States is decided by states. Consequently, not all states and universities seek CAEP’s approval of program degrees (Michelli, Dada, Eldridge, Tamim, & Karp, 2017). Because not all places participate in CAEP, this accrediting process may be mysterious for them.…”
Section: Literature Reviewed On Program Quality and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external review can stimulate dialogue regarding program review and improvements. Consequences for not meeting adherence to standards tend to be severe and include “de-accreditation” (Michelli et al, 2017). Quite possibly, although the 2016 CAEP Standards remain a responsibility of states, there is a move afoot in the nation toward increasingly greater quality assurance and regulation of undergraduate- and graduate-level program standards.…”
Section: Literature Reviewed On Program Quality and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After Covid-19, teachers are required to have additional competencies, namely technology-based competencies. In addition to fulfilling the teacher's function, namely regulating activities to teach students, train, and develop, and also manage to provide technical services in the field of education to improve the quality of education, the quality of teachers during the pandemic is the first aspect to be determined (Hidayati, 2021;Michelli et al, 2016;Prasetyo et al, 2022). This is because the teacher is the center of improving the quality of education, in other words, one of the important requirements for the development of the quality of education is if it is carried out by educators who can be relied on for their professionalism (Larson, 2017;Whitty, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%