“…Details are found in Figure 3. The contribution to the relationships (emphasized differences), and corresponding roles identification are outlined below: possession of intersection/meeting point, and divergent points, (Fitchett & Heafner, 2018); complementary relationship-complementary role of TrQ on TgQ, (Sachs, 2016); question of path to TgQ with psychological and developmental processes fueling TrQ, (Rimm-Kaufman & Hamre, 2010); identifying role of each concept on the other, (Myburgh & Tammaro, 2013); TgQ as an existent dialogue with TrQ, (Perez, 2013); TgQ as a measure of TrQ, (Mitchell et al, 2001); TrQ as the skills and attributes related to TgQ, (Churchward & Willis, 2018); consenting duties of concepts in theory, (Perez, 2013); catalyst serving reaction of TrQ, for TgQ, (Hiebert & Stigler, 2017); signal of accuracy in association and use, (Perez, 2013); harmonious constructive cooperative positions of concepts, (Fitchett & Heafner, 2018); derivative positioning structure of the concepts to each other-TrQ to be a subdivision of TgQ, (Churchward & Willis, 2018); breaking down the embodiments of TgQ assisting to piece together/allowing understanding of the concept of TrQ (constituents of TrQ have an intertwining relationship in laying a foundation for TgQ), (Rimm-Kaufman & Hamre, 2010); TgQ redefined within TrQ, (Rimm-Kaufman & Hamre, 2010); and joint progress relationship-promotion of one: TrQ, enhances promotion of the other: TgQ, (Hiebert & Stigler, 2017;Rimm-Kaufman & Hamre, 2010). These relationships also stand to highlight the roles of the concepts in theory and toward each other.…”