2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher turnover and non-pecuniary factors

Abstract: This paper studies teacher mobility using matched employee-employer panel data from Norwegian primary and lower secondary schools. The Norwegian institutional set-up with completely centralized wage setting for teachers is ideal to analyze the effect of non-pecuniary job attributes on quit decisions. We find that teachers tend to leave schools with high share of minority students and high share of students with special needs. In addition, the composition of teachers and the school size affect the propensity to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
5
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
58
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average quit rate is 18.2 percent, which is higher than for the population of teachers in permanent positions in Norwegian primary and lower secondary schools reported by Falch and Strøm (2005) and Falch and Rønning (2007). The relatively high quit rate in the present sample seems to be partly related to the fact that experimental schools at the outset are unpopular among teachers, and partly related to the fact that the sample consists of relatively small schools.…”
Section: Model Specificationcontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…The average quit rate is 18.2 percent, which is higher than for the population of teachers in permanent positions in Norwegian primary and lower secondary schools reported by Falch and Strøm (2005) and Falch and Rønning (2007). The relatively high quit rate in the present sample seems to be partly related to the fact that experimental schools at the outset are unpopular among teachers, and partly related to the fact that the sample consists of relatively small schools.…”
Section: Model Specificationcontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…First, if high ability students with school motivated parents tend to be located in schools with high teacher quality, failure to control for teacher quality differences would likely bias the effect of family resources. The same issue arises if teachers sort themselves systematically across schools according to student characteristics, as the evidence in for example Falch and Strøm (2005) suggests. Second, school motivated parents and students may sort themselves in order to maximize positive peer group effects.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Studies have found that teachers are prone to leave schools serving high proportions of low-achieving, low-income, and minority students for more economically and educationally advantaged schools; this departure causes a drain of experienced and effective teachers in these high demographic schools (Berry & Hirsch, 2005Cookson, 2005;Falch & Strom, 2005;Loeb et aL;Liu & Meyer, 2005;Ray, 2005;Viadero, 2005). In schools with very high teacher turnover rates, this turnover can pose a number of challenges, including lack of continuity in instruction, lack of adequate teaching expertise for making curriculum decisions and providing support and mentoring, and lost time and resources for replacement and training (Loeb et aL).…”
Section: School Culturementioning
confidence: 99%