2016
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2016.1145264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ experiences with co-teaching as a model for inclusive education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
59
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in a professional co-taught classroom, all students may take their benefits from the presence of a second teacher in the Austrian context. The positive effects of efficient and highquality co-teaching were outlined by various authors (Friend et al 2010;Murawski and Lee Swanson 2001;Pancsofar and Petroff 2016;Schwab et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, in a professional co-taught classroom, all students may take their benefits from the presence of a second teacher in the Austrian context. The positive effects of efficient and highquality co-teaching were outlined by various authors (Friend et al 2010;Murawski and Lee Swanson 2001;Pancsofar and Petroff 2016;Schwab et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unexplored is whether the special educator's score may have been impacted by content knowledge. Pancsofar and Petroff (2016) also found professional development expanded co-teachers' use of varied co-teaching models. It may be that even experienced co-teachers would benefit from professional development to increase the use of evidence-based practices (McKenna et al 2015) and varied co-teaching models.…”
Section: Limitations Future Research and Implications For Teachingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Each co-teaching model described thus far requires each co-teacher to be actively involved in instructional experiences for SWD and SWOD. However, there are two models typically characterised in the research as one co-teacher holding the primary or lead role for instruction whereas the other co-teacher serves in a more passive role as an observer or assistant (Pancsofar and Petroff 2016;Weiss and Lloyd 2002). Although researchers call for a range of co-teaching models to be used, there is concern when any specific co-teacher is primarily in the observer or assistant role, sometimes considered the supportive role, because of less parity between the co-teachers (Bouck 2007;Harbort et al 2007;Rice and Zigmond 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this push, and given the context of the accountability era, co-teaching is now a primary role of special education teachers trained in the area of mild disabilities (Friend et al, 2010;Ploessi et al, 2010). Friend, Reising, and Cook (1993) identified five distinct models of co-teaching; however, research has shown that without opportunities to hone this set of knowledge and skills, teachers tend to resort to using one model, whereby the general education teacher is responsible for the class, while the special educator simply provides individualized support for the students with disabilities (Pancsofar & Petroff, 2016). This first objective (participants will demonstrate an understanding of co-planning and co-teaching techniques) was measured using the following five statements regarding each team:…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%