2018
DOI: 10.1080/1046560x.2018.1427418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ Noticing of Students’ Thinking in Science Through Classroom Artifacts: In What Ways Are Science and Engineering Practices Evident?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often this practice leads to teachers categorizing student science ideas or responses as "correct" or "incorrect" and that in turn restricts them from attending to the substance of student thinking. Similar studies on teacher noticing have reported improvement in teachers noticing skills, progressing from descriptions and evaluations, to making at least some call-outs and connecting them to teaching principles with evidence (Van Es et al, 2017;Van Es & Sherin, 2008;Van Es & Sherin, 2002;Van Es & Barnhart, 2015;Luna et al, 2018). This progression is however closely tied to careful scaffolds provided to the teachers either through courses, discussions, software, videos, etc.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Often this practice leads to teachers categorizing student science ideas or responses as "correct" or "incorrect" and that in turn restricts them from attending to the substance of student thinking. Similar studies on teacher noticing have reported improvement in teachers noticing skills, progressing from descriptions and evaluations, to making at least some call-outs and connecting them to teaching principles with evidence (Van Es et al, 2017;Van Es & Sherin, 2008;Van Es & Sherin, 2002;Van Es & Barnhart, 2015;Luna et al, 2018). This progression is however closely tied to careful scaffolds provided to the teachers either through courses, discussions, software, videos, etc.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We found that most reported studies insist on various forms of scaffolds to support teacher reflection on their noticing and interpretation of student thinking. Studies that focus on pre service teachers, characterize novice teacher noticing skills when they examine student work (Luna, Selmer, & Rye, 2018), other teacher's instruction (Mitchell & Marin, 2015;Star & Strickland, 2008;Talanquer, Tomanek, & Novodvorsky, 2013)…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For teachers to notice student thinking, this thinking needs to be observable (Luna, et al, 2018). Our exploration of teachers' noticing during design-based science activities is set against the back-drop of design planning and drawing activities.…”
Section: Design Planning and Drawing As A Noticing Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kolodner et al, 2003;Fortus, Dershimer, Krajcik, Marx, & Mamlok-Naaman, 2004;Chusinkunawut, Henderson, Nugultham, Wannagatesiri, & Fakcharoenphol, 2020), we find various ways for students to share their thinking with teachers. When students share their thinking with teachers, student thinking can become observable meaning that teachers have an opportunity to notice it (Luna, Selmer, & Rye, 2018). In 'whiteboarding sessions', for example, students are encouraged to discuss design discoveries and questions with the class, during which teachers can "identify student misunderstanding and misconceptions" (Kolodner, et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on teacher development motivates attention to teacher noticing in preparation of mathematics teachers (e.g., Goldsmith & Seago, 2011;Jacobs, Lamb, & Philipp, 2010;Jacobs, Lamb, Philipp, & Schappelle, 2011;Mason, 2002;Sherin & van Es, 2009;Star & Strickland, 2008; van Es & Sherin, 2002) and science teachers (e.g., Barnhart & van Es, 2015;Luna, 2018;Luna, Selmer, & Rye, 2018). Teachers who notice student thinking, that is, identify and make sense of students' mathematical and scientific ideas and build on these ideas appropriately while making pedagogical decisions, are positioned to support reformoriented, student-centered mathematics and science instruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%