Teachers’ Training, Class Size and Students’ Outcomes: Learning from Administrative Forecasting Mistakes

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. This paper studies the impact of different teacher and class characteristics on third graders' outcomes. It uses a feature of the French system in which some novice teachers start their jobs before receiving any training. Three categories of teachers are included in the sample: experienced teachers, trained novice teachers and untrained novice teachers. To identify the effects, we use administrative mistakes in forecasting the number of teachers. We find that trained and untrained novice teachers are assigned to similar classes, whereas experienced teachers have better students located in better environments. Hence, in order to match similar students and classes, we focus on pupils with novice teachers and discard those with experienced teachers. In addition, we show that the same sample can be used to estimate the causal effect of class size on students' outcomes. Our findings are: (1) teachers' training substantially improves students' test scores in mathematics; (2) this training effect does not rely on different teaching practices, but mainly on subject matter competence; untrained teachers who majored in sciences at university improve their students' achievement as much as trained teachers do; (3) the class size effect is substantial and significant; class size does not seem to be correlated with instructional practices; (4) teachers' training does not improve the scores of initially low-achieving students and classes; on the contrary, a smaller class is more beneficial to low-achieving students within classes and to all students in low-achieving classes. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SJEL Classification: I21

Does Domestic Work Affect the Academic Performance of Girls in Primary School in Côte d’Ivoire? Empirical Evidence from Probit Model

“…By cons, regardless of age, girls from urban areas repeat their class since the number of students per class is important. This result confirms other cases generally derived from estimates in developed countries (Bressoux, et al, 2009;Krueger, 2003).…”

Teacher shortages and the business cycle

“…Evidence clearly indicates that novice teachers are less productive than experienced teachers, see for example Hanushek (2006). Moreover, Bressoux et al (2009) find that in France trained novice teachers are substantially more productive in terms of student test scores than untrained novice teachers.…”

The impact of teacher preparation on student achievement in algebra in a “hard-to-staff” urban PreK-12-university partnership

“…While K-12 institutions worldwide face teacher shortages in specific content areas-mathematics, science and special educationresearchers, policy-makers, and practitioners contest the most effective ways to prepare new teachers. Recent research efforts to assess the impact of teacher training on K-12 student achievement (Bressoux et al, 2006;Goldhaber & Brewer, 2000Laczko-Kerr & Berliner, 2003;Miller et al, 1998;Monk & King, 1994;Wenglinsky, 2000;Wilson, Floden, & Ferrini-Mundy, 2001, 2002 have applied analytical procedures to aggregated data from multiple state and national databases situated in different countries. For example, U.S. studies have analyzed data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS), Longitudinal Study of American Youth (LSAY), and Staffing Surveys (SASS).…”

“…Researchers have explored the attrition and retention rates of both traditionally and nontraditionally prepared teachers (Birkeland, 2003;Boser & Wiley, 1988;Boyd, Grossman, Lankford, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2006;Darling-Hammond, Berry, & Thoreson, 2001;Guarino et al, 2006;Haberman, 1999;Ingersoll, 2001;Shen, 1997;Stoddart, 1993), as well as some aspects of teacher performance, such as sense of efficacy (Guyton, Fox, & Sisk, 1991). However, considerable controversy has emerged about evidence that has addressed whether or not nontraditional and alternative teacher preparation programs produce teachers who are as competent and effective as those from the traditional teacher education programs (Boyd et al, 2006;Bressoux et al, 2006;Darling-Hammond et al, 2005;Decker, Mayer, & Glazerman, 2004;Goldhaber & Brewer, 2000.…”

“…In response to the recent global education community's charge for an assessment of the quality of teacher preparation and certification, international research has addressed a comparison of teacher characteristics and training (Angrist & Lavy, 2001;Bressoux et al, 2006;Chin et al, 2006;Darling-Hammond et al, 2005;Greenberg et al, 2004;Haberman, 1999;Navarro & Verdisco, 2000). Researchers have explored the attrition and retention rates of both traditionally and nontraditionally prepared teachers (Birkeland, 2003;Boser & Wiley, 1988;Boyd, Grossman, Lankford, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2006;Darling-Hammond, Berry, & Thoreson, 2001;Guarino et al, 2006;Haberman, 1999;Ingersoll, 2001;Shen, 1997;Stoddart, 1993), as well as some aspects of teacher performance, such as sense of efficacy (Guyton, Fox, & Sisk, 1991).…”