1963
DOI: 10.1080/0013188630050304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching by Machinery: A Review of Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1968
1968

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative effectiveness of learning from the two texts was measured by the final examination of the course. Leith (1962) reviewed the literature on the effectiveness of programmed versus comparable regular material. He concluded that programmed texts save time over conventional texts but do not lead to better performance on a content examination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative effectiveness of learning from the two texts was measured by the final examination of the course. Leith (1962) reviewed the literature on the effectiveness of programmed versus comparable regular material. He concluded that programmed texts save time over conventional texts but do not lead to better performance on a content examination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience with Crowder programs suggests that, unlike some linear programs, initial ability differences are preserved. Claims made for reduction in correlation with linear programs are, however, controversial (Leith, 1963). In the present case the correlation coefficients obtained were: r=-495 (significant) for the linear group and r=-89 (significant) for the branching group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the minimal criteria for information concerning length of program, number of students participating, amount taught, time taken and amount learnt, only six studies were satisfactory. However, there is evidence to suggest (Leith, 1963) that though programed instruction is not superior to conventional teaching in all respects, children taught by that method learn in less time, retain more information over a longer period of time and have a better understanding of the subject than those instructed by conventional methods. Unfortunately, advocates of programed instruction tend to ignore the immense PROGRAMED IN STRU CTI 0 N practical and administrative difficulties of introducing this form of teaching into the classroom (Haskell, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%