Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3059009.3072986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Computational Thinking to 8-Year-Olds through ScratchJr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another narration strategy was adopted by Faber, Ven, and Wierdsma (2017). Students first created a pen-andpaper model of their story, consisting of drawings indicating what happens in the story.…”
Section: Creating a Story And Narrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another narration strategy was adopted by Faber, Ven, and Wierdsma (2017). Students first created a pen-andpaper model of their story, consisting of drawings indicating what happens in the story.…”
Section: Creating a Story And Narrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although originally used as an outreach tool for experts visiting schools, where the time and resources weren't available to engage students with programming on a computer, it has since become popular for use in the classroom (Bell, Rosamond & Casey, 2012;Bell & Vahrenhold, 2018). Teachers around the world have been expected increasingly to introduce their students to elements of Computational Thinking (Yadav, Hong & Stephenson, 2016), and the unplugged approach has been an easy starting point because it uses familiar materials, and avoids the challenges of working with digital devices (Faber et al, 2017;Falkner et al 2019). However, this can lead to an "unplugged only" approach, which can lead students to miss the connection to digital devices (Feaster et al, 2011;Taub, Armoni & Ben-Ari, 2012;Wohl, Porter & Clinch, 2015), and miss out on experiencing the power of programming.…”
Section: Unplugged Activities and Computational Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Det tredje argumentet, det pedagogiska, betonar att programmering i förskolan inte är ett fristående ämne, utan ett verktyg som kan användas för att utveckla generiska kunskaper såsom att träna barn i problemlösning och logiskt eller så kallat datalogiskt tänkande (Heikkilä, 2019). Det finns åtskilliga tolkningar av detta flitigt använda begrepp som också benämns som computational thinking (Faber et al, 2017;Heintz et al, 2016;Lodi & Martini, 2021). Papert (1980) var den förste att använda detta centrala begrepp (Heintz et al, 2016;Howland et al, 2019), även om det var Wing (2006) som genom sina texter såg till att termen fick vid spridning (Heikkilä & Mannila, 2018) I studie I var målsättningen att få en generell bild av hur lärare i förskolan arbetar med datorplattor för att stödja barns lärande, både ur ett allmändidaktiskt och ämnesdidaktiskt perspektiv.…”
Section: Argument För Programmering I Förskolanunclassified