2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching reading strategies in history lessons: A micro-level analysis of professional development training and its practical challenges

Abstract: Reading comprehension is an important skill in secondary education, yet many history teachers find it difficult to provide adequate reading strategy instruction. In this study, we designed a digital learning environment to support teachers' instruction of reading strategies based on student data. We provided history teachers in the experimental conditions with a visualisation of student performance data. Additionally, these teachers received professional development (PD) training and a guiding manual on how to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies on reading strategy use have already focused on different target groups (e.g., children with autism; Jackson and Hanline, 2019 ; English Foreign Language learners; Habók and Magyar, 2019 ), in various subject domains (e.g., English language course; Shih et al, 2018 ; history; ter Beek et al, 2019 ), and at different educational levels (e.g., university level; Phakiti, 2008 ; secondary school students; Habók and Magyar, 2019 ). These studies mainly focus on reading strategy instruction (e.g., ter Beek et al, 2019 ) or on the relationship between reading strategy use and comprehension (e.g., Muijselaar et al, 2017 ). In this respect, good comprehenders appear to handle the use of strategies more strategically and effectively ( Wang, 2016 ; Zhang, 2018b ).…”
Section: Reading Comprehension Strategy Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies on reading strategy use have already focused on different target groups (e.g., children with autism; Jackson and Hanline, 2019 ; English Foreign Language learners; Habók and Magyar, 2019 ), in various subject domains (e.g., English language course; Shih et al, 2018 ; history; ter Beek et al, 2019 ), and at different educational levels (e.g., university level; Phakiti, 2008 ; secondary school students; Habók and Magyar, 2019 ). These studies mainly focus on reading strategy instruction (e.g., ter Beek et al, 2019 ) or on the relationship between reading strategy use and comprehension (e.g., Muijselaar et al, 2017 ). In this respect, good comprehenders appear to handle the use of strategies more strategically and effectively ( Wang, 2016 ; Zhang, 2018b ).…”
Section: Reading Comprehension Strategy Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, as Cheung and Slavin (2012) state, the use of technology to support and facilitate teachers' instruction is probably more effective than the use of technology in itself. However, teachers did not integrate the texts from the DLE with their regular curriculum, nor did they provide elaborate reading strategy instruction to their students during lesson observations (ter Beek et al, 2019). Nevertheless, future research could control for the possible influence of classroom instruction by including quantified observations of teachers' instructional practices as a background variable.…”
Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TPD programs have long been associated closely with professions as part of the requirements for continuous professional education. Studies focusing on TPD within the context of professions are quite plenty, such as TPD for teachers (Catalano et al , 2020; Dilshad et al , 2019; Erickson et al , 2017; ter Beek et al , 2019) or nurses (Black et al , 2019; Holloway et al , 2018; Welp et al , 2018). Studies on TPD within the business sector are also quite abundant, but they have predominantly focused on large-sized organizations (Cardon and Valentin, 2017; Short and Gray, 2018; Tam and Gray, 2016).…”
Section: Background Setting and Proposition Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%