1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)85470-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching the fundamentals of experimental design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigation of the three most relevant factors for ionization source conditions, namely SheaF (X 1 ), DryF (X 2 ), and VapoT (X 3 ), was achieved with a face-centered central composite design (CCD). Although Doehlert designs would require less experiments, CCD was selected because of the short analysis times and the superior degrees of freedom (DF) to assess the statistical quality of the model [63]. The CCD was composed of a full factorial design (20 trials) including six face-centered experiments and six trials performed at the center of the investigated ranges to evaluate the standard method error.…”
Section: Sensitivity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of the three most relevant factors for ionization source conditions, namely SheaF (X 1 ), DryF (X 2 ), and VapoT (X 3 ), was achieved with a face-centered central composite design (CCD). Although Doehlert designs would require less experiments, CCD was selected because of the short analysis times and the superior degrees of freedom (DF) to assess the statistical quality of the model [63]. The CCD was composed of a full factorial design (20 trials) including six face-centered experiments and six trials performed at the center of the investigated ranges to evaluate the standard method error.…”
Section: Sensitivity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the MINUIT program. The contraction/dilatation and weighting are involved in the relation [21] [22] ( )…”
Section: Optimization At the Points Of Evolving Simplexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response surfaces can also show the impact of small changes away from a set value on the method performance which is valuable information relating to method robustness. Response surfaces can be obtained by employing designs such as central composites [26] and Box-Behnken [27]. The beneficial use of central composite designs in HPLC method development has been shown [28].…”
Section: Central Composite Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%