1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.1981.tb00708.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching the Spoken Language

Abstract: TEACHING THE SPOKEN LANGUAGE This paper falls into two sections. In the first section I shall make some remarks about spoken language which I shall then make use of in the second section. The second section addresses the problems of what it might mean to teach and to assess the communicative competence of adolescent native speakers of a language. YULE, G. and SMITH, H.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
0
10

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
134
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way processing the new language becomes feasible as it becomes connected with concepts and words students have already used. Research findings have indicated that familiarity with passage content facilitates second-language listening comprehension (Chiang & Dunkel, 1992;Brown & Yule, 1983).…”
Section: Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this way processing the new language becomes feasible as it becomes connected with concepts and words students have already used. Research findings have indicated that familiarity with passage content facilitates second-language listening comprehension (Chiang & Dunkel, 1992;Brown & Yule, 1983).…”
Section: Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, with male/female dyads, again, I would suggest, a distorted perception of normative behaviour in English can result, as the degree of directness is only allowable if the two are close. Ideally, with senior high school learners, more realistic situations for adolescents in crosscultural contact environments, exposing them to interactive discourse with non-intimate adults, would provide safer, more appropriate role models and examples of language use (see Brown and Yule, 1983). Consequently, in my view, unless there are tasks to accompany such materials and unless linguistic variation is addressed explicitly, then such examples, to the exclusion of other kinds of interpersonal discourse exemplifying style-shifting in interactional language use, are questionable for pedagogical purposes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recalling Brown and Yule's (1983) distinction between transactional and interactional talk, Partington notes that while on the one hand briefings are highly informative texts with questions on the Palestinian crisis, South African government, the AIDS crisis, gas prices, OPEC and the like, on the other hand there are many interactional sequences and even some personal exchanges. Partington shows that two principal reasons why participants in briefings break into an interactional, more personal mode are either because of aggression (a transaction-threatening act has occurred) or because they want to play.…”
Section: Functions Of Laughtermentioning
confidence: 99%