2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44568-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team Cooperation Using Dual Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A distributed approach that is not based on explicit communication is described in Ferraresso et al (2000), in which two robots are able to exchange the ball by using direct communication of their roles and a fieldvector based collision avoidance that takes into account in a proper way the role of the robots. Other behavior based reactive MRS are presented in Brendenfeld and Kobialka (2000) and Carpin et al (2000). Our approach exhibits the following two features: on one hand, it exploits explicit communication among the robots for exchanging information about the status of the environment in order to achieve a distributed agreement on the actions to be performed; on the other hand, it is robust to possible communication failures, since in these cases the system degrades its performance, but it still keeps on the execution of the task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distributed approach that is not based on explicit communication is described in Ferraresso et al (2000), in which two robots are able to exchange the ball by using direct communication of their roles and a fieldvector based collision avoidance that takes into account in a proper way the role of the robots. Other behavior based reactive MRS are presented in Brendenfeld and Kobialka (2000) and Carpin et al (2000). Our approach exhibits the following two features: on one hand, it exploits explicit communication among the robots for exchanging information about the status of the environment in order to achieve a distributed agreement on the actions to be performed; on the other hand, it is robust to possible communication failures, since in these cases the system degrades its performance, but it still keeps on the execution of the task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach in [16] represents an example of reactive, weakly coordinated system, in which two robots are able to exchange the ball by using direct communication of their roles and a field-vector based collision avoidance that takes into account in a proper way the role of the robots. Other behavior based reactive MRS are presented in [7,10] On the other hand, successful deliberative centralized approaches in the Middle-Size league are used when it is possible to reliably reconstruct global information about the environment. For example the CS Freiburg team [19] makes use of very precise measurements given by laser scanners to reconstruct a global representation of the field and a social deliberative weakly centralized approach is obtained by dynamic selection of the robot that acts as the leader.…”
Section: Soccermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve that, we have implemented g b in Eq. 2 as a bistable ground form (see [BK01] Sec. 4 for details) providing some hysteresis effect.…”
Section: Bbss As Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DD has recently been extended with team variables [BK01], which are exported by a behavior system, so that other behavior systems (robots) can read their current values. For every team variable only the exporting behavior systems is allowed to change its value, for all others it's value is read-only.…”
Section: Bbss As Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%