2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team performance and collective efficacy in the dynamic psychology of competitive team: A Bayesian network analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this study has been reached through the elaboration of the BN, the subsequent TANs and some major instantiations. Our study shows the importance of the role played by social attraction (as was predicted by Carron and Eys ([2,9,36]) and the team members' expectations, as was outlined when studying the role of self-efficacy related to the teams' performance [8]. These two variables appear as the BN antecessors, influencing the rest of the variables.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The aim of this study has been reached through the elaboration of the BN, the subsequent TANs and some major instantiations. Our study shows the importance of the role played by social attraction (as was predicted by Carron and Eys ([2,9,36]) and the team members' expectations, as was outlined when studying the role of self-efficacy related to the teams' performance [8]. These two variables appear as the BN antecessors, influencing the rest of the variables.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…However, it is difficult to find studies that relate the equipment they need to cooperate with effective performance [8]. Some psychological factors of collaborative teams have been studied more than others in terms of performance, such as cohesion [9,10] or group facilitators and blockers' roles [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Learning a BN implies learning the structure of the directed acyclic graph, which is the identification of the topology of the BN, and parametric learning, that is the estimation of numerical parameters (conditional probabilities) given the topology (Fuster-Parra, García-Mas, Ponseti, & Leo, 2015).…”
Section: Learning Bnmentioning
confidence: 99%