2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.90.062406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tearing of thin sheets: Cracks interacting through an elastic ridge

Abstract: We study the interaction between two cracks propagating quasistatically during the tearing of a thin brittle sheet. We show that the cracks attract each other following a path described by a power law resulting from the competition between elastic and fracture energies. The power law exponent (8/11) is in close agreement with experiments. We also show that a second (asymptotic) regime, with an exponent of 9/8, emerges for small distances between the two crack tips due to the finite transverse curvature of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the final configuration of the torn off graphene nanoribbon is determined by a competition between the elastic energy stored in the graphene sheet and adhesion energy between graphene and substrate, in good agreement with experimental observations and theoretical modeling (Hamm et al 2008). Although a great deal Moura and Marder (2013) with permission of effort has been devoted to the understanding of tear fracture in an elastic thin sheet (Ghatak and Mahadevan 2003;Audoly et al 2005;Kruglova et al 2011;Roman 2013;Romero et al 2013;Takei et al 2013;Brau 2014), only a few studies have been focused on the tear fracture of graphene. Moura and Marder (2013) conducted theoretical modeling and MD simulations of the tearing of a clamped, free-standing graphene under constant downward force (Fig.…”
Section: Other Fracture Modes In Graphenesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It was found that the final configuration of the torn off graphene nanoribbon is determined by a competition between the elastic energy stored in the graphene sheet and adhesion energy between graphene and substrate, in good agreement with experimental observations and theoretical modeling (Hamm et al 2008). Although a great deal Moura and Marder (2013) with permission of effort has been devoted to the understanding of tear fracture in an elastic thin sheet (Ghatak and Mahadevan 2003;Audoly et al 2005;Kruglova et al 2011;Roman 2013;Romero et al 2013;Takei et al 2013;Brau 2014), only a few studies have been focused on the tear fracture of graphene. Moura and Marder (2013) conducted theoretical modeling and MD simulations of the tearing of a clamped, free-standing graphene under constant downward force (Fig.…”
Section: Other Fracture Modes In Graphenesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…T herefore, the understanding o f tearing o f these films in practical applications m ust be made in the fram ew ork o f isom etrically deform ed films. In this regard we are puzzled by recent w orks that explain tearing in thin films by using a stretching ridge to account for the elastic energy distribution during fracture [14,15,23]. An analytical approach connecting these tw o asym ptotic states and describing the transition in an equivalent or sim ilar configuration is m uch needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interplay between geometry, surface energy, stretching and bending deformation leads to non-trivial and rich behaviors (Bayart et al, 2010(Bayart et al, , 2011Takei et al, 2013;Brau, 2014;Ibarra et al, 2016), particularly when the thin film is adhesively coupled to a flat (Hamm et al, 2008) or curved (Kruglova et al, 2011) substrate. The complexity of these problems restricts analytical approximate solutions to very simplified settings (e.g.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inextensible limit) (Hamm et al, 2008;Roman, 2013;Brau, 2014). Simple energetic models in these references have been remarkably successful in explaining almost quantitatively nontrivial observations such as the dependence of crack path on interfacial adhesion (Hamm et al, 2008;Roman, 2013), peeling angle (Bayart et al, 2011;Roman, 2013;Brau, 2014), or anisotropy in the fracture surface energy (Takei et al, 2013;Ibarra et al, 2016). However, a general modeling approach to tearing, capable of examining in detail the mechanics of tearing in general geometries and arbitrary material parameter regimes has been lacking.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%