2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2021.100133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical-and-allocative inefficiency index of Indian sugarcane farms- A primal system approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in line with the results of Asif Ali Abro (2012). The farmers who are having less landholding are risk taker comparing to the farmers have large landholding (Calle et al, 2022;Felix et al, 2021). The small land holding farmers are diversifying their cultivation to minimize the risk may be a reason for the negative coefficient value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results are in line with the results of Asif Ali Abro (2012). The farmers who are having less landholding are risk taker comparing to the farmers have large landholding (Calle et al, 2022;Felix et al, 2021). The small land holding farmers are diversifying their cultivation to minimize the risk may be a reason for the negative coefficient value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Each farmer uses different types and quantities of chemical fertilizers, so this study was categorized as chemical fertilizers. In line with previous studies by Felix et al (2021), 1% increase in fertilizer use will increase sugarcane production by 0.187% in India. Zainuddin and Wibowo (2018) showed that adding 1% chemical/inorganic fertilizer could increase sugarcane production by 0.056% at PTPN X Kediri Region.…”
Section: Respondent Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The mechanization index in sugarcane cultivation of semi-medium farmers was about The results show the mechanization index of marginal farmers in sugarcane cultivation was minimal in selected regions, this may be due to small land holdings farmers preferring animal and human labours rather than mechanical power. As per the previous and present studies the mechanization index was increased like some of researchers mentioned in their works Felix et al [11], Ashraf et al [12].…”
Section: Mechanization Index In Sugarcane Cultivation Based On Type O...supporting
confidence: 86%