2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05538.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical considerations when obtaining and interpreting prostatic biopsies from men with suspicion of early prostate cancer: Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proper diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer is still a major challenge faced by oncologists and radiologists all over the world; as both PSA levels and imaging have had their limitations with respect to diagnosis, staging, and prognosis. Both conventional radiological imaging and PSA levels show high false positives during screening due to confounding effects of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer is still a major challenge faced by oncologists and radiologists all over the world; as both PSA levels and imaging have had their limitations with respect to diagnosis, staging, and prognosis. Both conventional radiological imaging and PSA levels show high false positives during screening due to confounding effects of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both conventional radiological imaging and PSA levels show high false positives during screening due to confounding effects of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis. [1] The advent of PET has seen the use of several radiotracers such has FDG PET, 11C-Acetate, F18-Choline, and C11- Choline for prostate cancer imaging. FDG-PET avidity in prostate cancer is minimal and variable and could be an incidental finding due to benign disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of PSA values has to be correlated with imaging modalities since lymph node and skeletal metastases can be present without any obvious increase in PSA values or PSA levels could increase after chemotherapy without any obvious underlying disease. [1910] These problems have led to identification of more robust surface biomarkers in prostate cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous recent studies have shown that a significant number of cancers are missed with this cutoff 13 . A PSA cut-off of 4.0 ng/mL has a sensitivity of 67-80%, which implies that 20-30% of cancers are missed when only the PSA level is obtained 14 . In order to improve the sensitivity, a 2.5 ng/mL cutoff was recently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in the United States.…”
Section: Detection Of Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%