2017
DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v8n3p172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Efficiency of Manufacturing Firms in Cameroon: Sources and Determinants

Abstract: The primary objective of this study is to analyze the determinants of efficiency in manufacturing firms in Cameroon. The study used a stochastic frontier model employing RPED data of 319 firms from different manufacturing industries. The data are micro-level which is the most adequate type of data used in the estimation of these models. The model used is that outlined by Battese and Coelli (1995) which determines the causes of inefficiency in the manufacturing sector in Cameroon. The estimates of the stochasti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The firm size coefficient (FSize) is negative and significant, in line with earlier studies (Sugiharti et al, 2019;Tingum and Ofeh, 2017;Vu, 2016) suggesting that larger size firms experience lower inefficiency on production. Larger firms are often equipped with more capital and more modern equipment than smaller ones, thereby enjoying more benefits from technology diffusion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The firm size coefficient (FSize) is negative and significant, in line with earlier studies (Sugiharti et al, 2019;Tingum and Ofeh, 2017;Vu, 2016) suggesting that larger size firms experience lower inefficiency on production. Larger firms are often equipped with more capital and more modern equipment than smaller ones, thereby enjoying more benefits from technology diffusion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hypothesis 2, which states that 'firm size has a negative impact on inefficiency,' is accepted for all firms and the cluster firms in ISIC 34, 35, and 37. This finding corresponds with the organizational theory and supports prior empirical studies either in Indonesia or elsewhere (Parida & Pradhan, 2017;Noor & Siang, 2014;Sahoo & Nauriyah, 2014;Tingum & Ofeh, 2017;AC-Ogbonna, 2018;Setiawan et al, 2019;Musau et al, 2020;Octarina & Mariam, 2021).…”
Section: Results Of Firm Size's Effects On Technical Inefficiencysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The FSize variable in model 1 shows a negative and significant sign of technical inefficiency. In other words, the larger the company, the higher the company's performance, this is in line with the positive relationship between company scale and company performance (Chapelle and Plane, 2005;Charoenrat et al, 2013;Tingum and Ofeh, 2017). This is contrary to research which states that companies with larger production scales are not easy to remain consistently efficient compared to companies with small production scales (Biggs et al, 1996;Aggrev et al, 2010).…”
Section: Table 5 Estimated Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%