1980
DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1980.8.4.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note

Abstract: An on-line methods for quantification of fetal heart rate variability (FHRV) from fetal electrocardiography (FECG) is presented. A CMOS microprocessor system with a 2k read-only-memory and a 4k random-access-memory is constructed. The processor is connected to a commercial cardiotocograph, and it calculates the interval index (II) measuring the long-term variability and the differential index (DI) measuring the short-term variability of FHR. The accuracy of the system was tested by calculating the FHRV indices… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten of the 43 studies were from the UK [25][26][27]35,[37][38][39]49,50,55], 22 from other European countries [24,[28][29][30][31][32][33]36,40,[42][43][44]48,[51][52][53][54]56,57,61,64,65], five from Japan [41,59,60,62,63], one from India [45], one from Australia [66], three from the United States of America (USA) [46,47,58], and one study from both the Netherlands and USA [34]. The included studies were heterogeneous, they had a median sample size of 34.5 participants (range 1-657) and a median number of recordings of 63 (range 1-657).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ten of the 43 studies were from the UK [25][26][27]35,[37][38][39]49,50,55], 22 from other European countries [24,[28][29][30][31][32][33]36,40,[42][43][44]48,[51][52][53][54]56,57,61,64,65], five from Japan [41,59,60,62,63], one from India [45], one from Australia [66], three from the United States of America (USA) [46,47,58], and one study from both the Netherlands and USA [34]. The included studies were heterogeneous, they had a median sample size of 34.5 participants (range 1-657) and a median number of recordings of 63 (range 1-657).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-five out of the 43 studies were specifically concerned with a device to measure the FHR. Twenty-nine studies utilised only fECG devices, of which nine were unnamed [24,25,27,30,31,40,44,49,55] and the remaining 20 studies used either: Monica AN24 device [26,33,34,36,38,39,[50][51][52]54,56,58]; Telefetalcare [28,29,53]; FECGV1 [35]; Cardiolab Babycard [43]; Nemo fetal monitor [48,57]; or Corometrics 112 abdominal ECG monitor [47]. Two studies used only fPCG devices, of which one was named the Fetaphon-2000 [42] and the other was unnamed [45].…”
Section: Fhr Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations