2012
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Bone DNA extraction and purification using silica‐coated paramagnetic beads

Abstract: The goal of this study was to develop a simple method to improve DNA recovery from challenging bone samples. To this end, an optimized procedure was developed that combined the demineralization and DNA extraction into a single step, followed by DNA purification using an automated silica-coated paramagnetic bead procedure. This method replaced a previous silica-membrane-based procedure, which was able to recover sufficient DNA to obtain full autosomal and Y chromosome STR profiles from greater than 90% of the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 100 mg of bone shavings was incubated overnight at 56°C, with rotation, in 300 μL of 0.5 M EDTA, with 200 μg of proteinase K. 30 μL of 3.0 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2 was then added to the mix , and the mix was extracted with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and chloroform and then purified by passage through a Qiagen DNeasy ® Blood and Tissue Kit silica column in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 100 mg of bone shavings was incubated overnight at 56°C, with rotation, in 300 μL of 0.5 M EDTA, with 200 μg of proteinase K. 30 μL of 3.0 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2 was then added to the mix , and the mix was extracted with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and chloroform and then purified by passage through a Qiagen DNeasy ® Blood and Tissue Kit silica column in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA binding in this process is highly specifi c and the use of guanidinium isothiocyanate (GuSCN) seems to prevent the co-extraction of potentially inhibitory compounds present in the samples [ 32 ]. Binding of DNA to silica is strongly pH dependant; pH above 7.5 can drastically reduce DNA recovery [ 33 ] so the use of compounds such as EDTA, SDS, and DTT that affect the pH needs to be done in a manner to minimize the detrimental effects. Although organic methods perform well and are less expensive, silica methods use less hazardous materials and are more amenable to automation [ 34 ].…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, silica based DNA binding procedures are known to be effective in removing PCR inhibitors such as humic acid, iron, cobalt, tannins and so forth [1,6,27,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Organic Extraction Versus Silica Column Based Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, chelating methods are routine choices in many laboratories because of the fact that DNA can be successfully isolated of from bones without co-purification of PCR inhibitors [1,[34][35]. Also silica offers many advantages such as low toxicity, biocompatibility, low cost, quick and easy, scalable, efficient removal of PCR inhibitors [27,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%