2017
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2017.1602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Note—On the Relation Between Several Discrete Choice Models

Abstract: In this paper, we study the relationship between several well known classes of discrete choice models, i.e., the random utility model (RUM), the representative agent model (RAM), and the semiparametric choice model (SCM). Using a welfare-based model as an intermediate, we show that the RAM and the SCM are equivalent. Furthermore, we show that both models as well as the welfare-based model strictly subsume the RUM when there are three or more alternatives, while the four are equivalent when there are only two a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, Theorem 2 below tells use that the two general frameworks are actually equivalent. The proof makes use of Theorem 1 and some results in [10]. The equivalence provides a new way to view regularized MDPs through the lens of stochastic MDPs.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, Theorem 2 below tells use that the two general frameworks are actually equivalent. The proof makes use of Theorem 1 and some results in [10]. The equivalence provides a new way to view regularized MDPs through the lens of stochastic MDPs.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w s is a vector of size |A| with entries w sa = r(a|s) + γ s q(s |s, a)V (s ). Using Theorem 1 in [10], we have that for any strictly convex function φ s (•), there is always a distribution set Ξ s such that T RE, φ φ φ [V ](s) = T DS, Ξ [V ](s) for any w s ∈ R |A| , and vise-versa. As a result, for any set of convex functions φ φ φ = { φ s , s ∈ S} there always a set Ξ = { Ξ s , s ∈ S} such that T RE,φ φ φ [V ] = T DS,Ξ [V ] for any V ∈ R |S| , and vice-versa.…”
Section: A3 Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the representative agent model, though it is equivalent to the welfare‐based choice model as shown by Feng et al. (2017), only a necessary condition for the substitutability of qr is provided in Feng et al. (2018).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative agent model: Our MICONVP formulation is based on a characterization of logit probabilities as solutions of a concave maximization problem where the decision variables correspond to the choice probabilities and the objective function is the entropy-regularized expected utility. This concave maximization problem is an example of a representative agent model, and has been studied in a number of papers in the economics and operations management literatures (Anderson et al 1988, Hofbauer and Sandholm 2002, Feng et al 2017. The goal of our paper is not to contribute directly to this literature, but rather to leverage one such result so as to obtain an exact and computationally tractable reformulation of the logit-based SOCPD problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%