2017
DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-12051-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: The US Dobson station network data record prior to 2015, re-evaluation of NDACC and WOUDC archived records with WinDobson processing software

Abstract: Abstract. The United States government has operated Dobson ozone spectrophotometers at various sites, starting during the International Geophysical Year (1 July 1957 to 31 December 1958). A network of stations for long-term monitoring of the total column content (thickness of the ozone layer) of the atmosphere was established in the early 1960s and eventually grew to 16 stations, 14 of which are still operational and submit data to the United States of America's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the balloon burst at a pressure smaller than 7 hPa, the residual column ozone was calculated from 7 hPa. The Dobson instruments at Boulder, South Pole, Hilo, and American Samoa are collocated (within 30 km) with the ozonesonde launch site and taken on the same day as the ozonesonde profile measurement (Evans et al, 2017). Figures 9, 10, 11, and 12 show the percent difference (ozonesonde − Dobson) in the total column ozone of the two instruments.…”
Section: Results Of Uncertainty Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the balloon burst at a pressure smaller than 7 hPa, the residual column ozone was calculated from 7 hPa. The Dobson instruments at Boulder, South Pole, Hilo, and American Samoa are collocated (within 30 km) with the ozonesonde launch site and taken on the same day as the ozonesonde profile measurement (Evans et al, 2017). Figures 9, 10, 11, and 12 show the percent difference (ozonesonde − Dobson) in the total column ozone of the two instruments.…”
Section: Results Of Uncertainty Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent software update resulted in a re-evaluation of the Dobson ozone record for the NOAA instrument complement. The new records were compared to the original NDACC and WOUDC records (Evans et al, 2017). At the completion of the evaluation, new data sets were archived at NDACC and WOUDC.…”
Section: Constraining Uncertainties In Ozone Absorption Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldman et al, 1999). Mobile reference instruments are used for cross-calibrating stratospheric lidar (Godin et al, 1999;Keckhut et al, 2004;Steinbrecht et al, 2009) and to maintain rigorous standards within the Dobson network (Komhyr et al, 1989;Evans et al, 2017). For ozone-sondes the World Centre for Calibration of Ozonesondes in Jülich operates a chamber in which several instruments are tested simultaneously with ozone, temperature and pressure profiles that simulate environments from tropical to polar conditions (Smit et al, 2007(Smit et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Quality Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ETC of a primary standard instrument is determined using observations made at Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO) and are calculated using zero air mass factor extrapolation (Langley plot method). It can be transferred to other instruments by comparisons with a traveling standard instrument (Fioletov et al, 2005).…”
Section: Retrieval Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%