2013
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-299-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Note: Use of remote sensing for landslide studies in Europe

Abstract: Abstract. Within the framework of FP7, an EU-funded SafeLand project, a questionnaire was prepared to collect information about the use of remote sensing for landslide study and to evaluate its actual application in landslide detection, mapping and monitoring. The questionnaire was designed using a Google form and was disseminated among end-users and researchers involved in landslide studies in Europe. In total, 49 answers from 17 different European countries were collected. The outcomes showed that landslide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(84 reference statements)
2
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The main goals of the study were (i) reviewing the general state of slope-instability investigation and monitoring approaches in different European and Asian countries, (ii) assessing effectiveness/reliability of each method for slope instability investigation and monitoring, and (iii) evaluating applicability of the monitoring techniques for early warning. The study complements similar research presented by Tofani et al (2013), which is focused specifically on remote-sensing approaches for landslide monitoring, and by Michoud et al (2013), focused on the operating landslide early-warning centres.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The main goals of the study were (i) reviewing the general state of slope-instability investigation and monitoring approaches in different European and Asian countries, (ii) assessing effectiveness/reliability of each method for slope instability investigation and monitoring, and (iii) evaluating applicability of the monitoring techniques for early warning. The study complements similar research presented by Tofani et al (2013), which is focused specifically on remote-sensing approaches for landslide monitoring, and by Michoud et al (2013), focused on the operating landslide early-warning centres.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The validation of the results is not simple because it is very difficult to find an area where the landslides are both spatially and temporally correctly located. Landslides can be accurately detected and mapped by remote sensing techniques or field surveys, but these activities can be very time consuming and sometimes they represent the main objective of a work (Tofani et al, 2013). The time of occurrence, in turn, is very rarely known with hourly precision, and usually landslides are just reported to be related to a rainstorm, without any more precise timing.…”
Section: Hiresss Testing and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the types of slow-moving landslides (Varnes, 1978) investigated by DInSAR data analyses in the aforementioned studies are mainly: slides and earth flows, deep-seated gravitational movements and creep phenomena (Tofani et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Dinsar Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, remote sensing techniques can offer a valuable contribution, as it is testified by the rapidly growing number of scientific works dealing with landslide inventory mapping achieved by means of the analysis of the information gathered by either passive or active air-and space-borne sensors or the integration of traditional ground-based monitoring with remote sensing data (Catani et al, 2005;Nichol and Wong, 2005;Van den Eeckhout et al, 2007;Tofani et al, 2013). In particular, as it is pointed out in the report "Deliverable 4.4" (SafeLand Deliverable 4.4, 2011) of the EU-funded SafeLand Project (http://www.safeland-fp7.eu), Synthetic Aperture Radar Differential Interferometry (DIn-SAR) techniques may represent suitable tools for updating inventory maps dealing with slow-moving landslides, namely mass movement phenomena whose typical velocity values range from few mm yr −1 up to 1.6 m yr −1 (Cruden and Varnes, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%