2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical notes on endothelial progenitor cells: Ways to escape from the knowledge plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
200
1
19

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
12
200
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…8,46,47 Therefore, clinical correlation data such as provided by our study are useful to attribute more biological relevance to one putative EPC phenotype vs. the others. For example, one could speculate that CD34+KDR+ cell phenotype may correlate with pathological vascular damage and increased CV risk, 48 while CD133+KDR+ and CD34+CD133+KDR+ are likely related to oxidative status and endothelial function as suggested by their status in BS/GS that is, increased CD133+KDR+ and CD34+CD133+KDR+ and unchanged CD34+KDR+, which fits with the biochemical, molecular and functional picture of good endothelial status reported in these patients. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][26][27][28] In conclusion, the study documents in a human system that EPC numbers and specific populations are related to important clinical and biochemical factors involved in CV status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…8,46,47 Therefore, clinical correlation data such as provided by our study are useful to attribute more biological relevance to one putative EPC phenotype vs. the others. For example, one could speculate that CD34+KDR+ cell phenotype may correlate with pathological vascular damage and increased CV risk, 48 while CD133+KDR+ and CD34+CD133+KDR+ are likely related to oxidative status and endothelial function as suggested by their status in BS/GS that is, increased CD133+KDR+ and CD34+CD133+KDR+ and unchanged CD34+KDR+, which fits with the biochemical, molecular and functional picture of good endothelial status reported in these patients. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][26][27][28] In conclusion, the study documents in a human system that EPC numbers and specific populations are related to important clinical and biochemical factors involved in CV status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Interestingly, miR-146a expression was validated in CACs obtained from CHF patients and CTR subjects. This ex vivo cellular model was chosen because CACs are involved in vascular renewal and can be easily purified from peripheral blood, and CACs obtained from CHF patients have a distinguishing feature of senescence (Olivieri et al 2012;Fadini et al 2008;Rehman et al 2003). A 1,000-fold increase of miR-146a expression along with a strong reduction of IRAK1 expression was observed in CACs of CHF patients compared to CTR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BOECs belong to the family of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), which harbors a heterogeneous selection of different cell types, participating in and modulating neovascularization. Distinct EPC subtypes are defined using different culture techniques and/or combinations of cell surface markers 1, 2, 3. BOECs, also referred to as circulating endothelial colony‐forming cells (ECFCs) or late outgrowth EPCs, are the only cell type featuring the characteristics of a “true” EPC, given that these cells are self‐renewing, clonogenic, and able to form capillary‐like structures and integrate into functional blood vessels in vitro and in vivo, respectively 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%